|
Senatricks
Diane Feinstem (D) from California is not one of the sharpest
knives in the drawer on a sunny day. Catch her on a
day when her face sags into a bag boutique and you are bound to
get a lecture that will make you want to break out into dry
heeves and endless laughter. Feinstein,
92, hasn't aged well in recent years and tends to feel obligated
to remind everyone of the depth of her intelligence and
knowledge of the subjects at hand with emotional bases for her
arguments over serious discussions of Constitutional
power. And when the Constitution gets in the way,
just say you have enough years on earth to make you an
expert. (Note to Matt - thanks for the heads up!)
In
this exchange on the Constitution with a sniveling freshman
Republican, Senator Cruz, she was reminded in public, a rarity,
about how little she actually does know about the Constitution
and offered a retaliation back with an emotional and 100% fact
free retort that caught everyone slack jawed and this reporter
in hysterics.
Democrats
have long decided to throw the Constitution under the bus when
it comes to actual rights that are specified in it like freedom
of speech, association, religion, and the right to keep and to
bear arms, but are so gracious to invent rights like killing
your fetus without due process rights and the right to compel
someone to purchase health insurance.
When
Senator Cruz offered an actual analysis of the Constitution
vis-a-vis the 2nd Amendment, Feinstein let loose her emotional,
inner woman and proceeded to equate being in the Senate for over
20 years and being a mayor of a declining California city as
reason why she can advocate gun control, the fur started to fly
and she let her inner bitch show just like former Secretary of
State Chillary Clinton did when confronted with an uncomfortable
(and impossible to answer honestly) question; when you are a
woman and you are nailed with the truth, cry and get angry -
that is a defense of the vajayjay.
Senatricks Feinstein
then proceeded to lecture Senator Cruz by saying you have over
2,700 other kinds of guns (no one fact checked her on this) you
can choose from and then whined "How Many More Do you
Need?" as her defense of advocating limiting a right that
the Constitution specifically says "Shall not be
infringed".
|
It is odd that
Senatricks Feinstein does not share the same feelings on a
"right" that was never in the Constitution, abortion,
which by its very nature actually violates a Constitutional
protection on several grounds - denies due process to another
human and rights are only rights when they do not infringe on
another's basic liberties. Feinstein does not want
limits in a woman's reproductive rights but has no problem
arbitrarily picking out what types of guns Americans can
own. And make no mistake, Feinstein is NOT a gun
expert and has never demonstrated once any competence in the
subject. Her famous rant is that no one needs more
than 10 rounds to defend oneself, but she has no problem owning
guns herself or allowing guns with more than 10 rounds to defend
her in the possession of her security forces.
I suppose it is
easy for ignorant fools like Senatricks Feinstein to arbitrarily
limit the number of rounds in your guns for self defense - have
they been woken up in the middle of the night and still in the fog
of sleep as there are noises downstairs and you have no idea what
is happening? Then as you navigate through the
darkness you see a big shadow in the house (you live alone) and
you fear for your own life? Do you want to only
have 10 chances to protect yourself or would you rather have
more? Do you only want to be limited to having
only government approved guns to defend yourself while your
perpetrator, already a law breaker by virtue of breaking and
entering your home, has no compulsion to read from Senatricks
Feinstein's approved, politically correct gun list?
At that moment, the
right to keep and bear arms becomes absolute and Senatricks
Feinstein and her ilk become the shadows in the dark threatening
your life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. It
is convenient to use the excuse of nut jobs who get guns from
illegal or unauthorized means as a way to advance your party's
agenda to use tragedy to limit gun ownership. But,
when you as a private citizen are facing life and death in the
face, you should have the option to use any and all means
necessary to protect yourself from an intruder.
And you should have the same protection that Senatricks Feinstein
allows herself - any gun.
So don't buy the
"how many more do you need?" crap. You need
what you can have under the Constitution, and not what some
idiotic, emotional, and ideologically driven Senatricks thinks YOU
can have.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment