The fake war on women has been contrived in order to allow ugly and frigid women leverage by which they can use their nasty cunts in order to avoid being equal to men. You see, women only want equality when it suits their biology; at any other turn, women exploit their biology to avoid being equal. Whether it is a biological excuse for killing their children to demanding that physical standards be lowered because it is wrong to hold a man and a woman to equal standards, women try to have their cake and eat it too.
Yet, there is an overt war on all things masculine. While the war that has been declared has yet to result in compulsory penile amputation and castration of the twins, make no mistake, women are perfectly content to sever manhood when it suits female motives to demand equality while practicing overt sexism.
What has brought this editorial to a head (no pun intended), is the news that students at Vanderbilt have been warmed than muscular men advances the wrong kind of masculinity. You see leftists - these are the only motha fockas who want wimpy men - are hell bent to make all things that define masculinity into another case of word redefinition. These asshole leftists are now stating that men with big muscles are overtly threatening and a danger to women (and metrosexual men born with tiny peens). Muscles are flagrant attempts to demean women (yet big ass focking boobs are not an attempt to ensnare men with mammary weaponary). In some versions of this hatred of men with muscles, it is even postulated that it is unfair men can have such big muscles and women are not born with that gift.
We've had the pathetic attack upon men's body hair for the past two decades - reducing men from their natural look of body hair to one of being boys completely shaved and in a perpetual 11 year old state where women can lorde over men and to use the the threat of no fellatio as a means to emasculate men anyway. Stripping the man of his mane, his body hair, is an overt attack upon men - a war on the physical traits of men just as bashing men for being muscular seeks to create penis carriers of no apparent strength to defend themselves. Women are not content with forcing men to remove the man fur - they are into total pubicide - to the total deforestation of old growth pubes - the insidious scorched body attack upon men. Once again if you can remove the entire male body fur, you do create a boy - something that women can control. And in total defiance as the stated reason why women should be able to kill their unborn, women want to control men's bodies by deforestation of all that is manly about men.
There is even the war on men on how we sit - women up in arms that a man dare spread his legs to give his goods room to settle down and to not be constricted by clothing. Of course when a man spreads his legs he also is showcasing his package - an overt threat to women - visual sexual assault on weak women by showing off how large the package is and how ripe he is for mating. Since women cannot tolerate a man exploiting his sexuality like women routinely use on men, manspreading is nearly as insidious as rape.
There has come time that women need to be placed back where they belong - in burlap bags and drowned as witches along with a couple hundred pounds of stones to ensure they never open their traps again above water. I don't ask. I don't implore. I demand that women shut the hell up and worry more about the smell between your legs than what men do. We scratch because we need to and we can. We spread our legs because we want to and we can. And we have man fur because we are men. We have pubes because it aids in sexual arousal of our partner. I suggest that women take heed and practice what they preach - control your focking bodies and leave our foreskin, our fur, our manspreading, and our muscles to us.
And learn to give head and swallow, bitches.
No comments:
Post a Comment