| Let's
face it.
In order to
fabricate any case for "gay marriage", you had to
change the meaning of marriage. And the left
did just that. Rather than to accept
"domestic partnerships" as the term for gay couple
unions, the proponents of the "fock you, breeders"
campaign decided to co-opt the term "marriage",
redefine it to suit ONLY THEIR NARROW NEEDS, and then forced
that redefinition onto the rest of the
world. And just to make the insult to
those who believed "marriage" meant what marriage has
meant for centuries, the proponents of bastardizing the language
flipped the bird to society and said "are you afraid we'll
have stronger marriages than breeders?"
And now to
insult "hero".
Marriage is not
the only unholy actions that have gone on in the darkness with
the bastards from the left. Now they've
really done it. They've decided to bastardize
"hero". Once upon a time, "hero"
was someone who was brave and exhibited selfless actions to save
lives or to assist others.
Now we have HERO
- "Houston Equal Rights Ordinance".
Don't think for a minute that the acronym wasn't chosen
arbitrarily. Here in the United States we have
a cottage industry of leftist and non-profit causes carefully
fabricating worthless, but politically correct acronyms for
their chosen names. Deciding to rape the
word "hero" that suggest bravery by making it one that
now panders to men who want to be women or who have gender
identity issues that result in them dressing like women but
carrying all the trappings of attached erectile rape
instruments, the proponents of the "shove transgenderism"
onto society at large wouldn't fly - so they added the trappings
of goodness and spice and slipped in things you just can't be
against (unless you are evil bigots from Texas) like race, age, gender, pregnancy, religion, sexual orientation, disability or military status.
Who could be against those with military status (Code Pink would
be)? Who could be against the disabled
(without the disabled the Democrats couldn't show a Republican
pushing someone in a wheel chair over a cliff in a political
commercial)? Republicans just love the
pregnant and those who are religious (unless they are satanists
who are mooslims).
So the creators
of the HERO provisions put in enough things that Republicans
would love and then slipped in the poison pill of having to
respect men who think they are women but who are really men who
want to use a women's bathroom. And judging by
how many perverts we have now in the world, it is safe to say that a man who
is a real man who wants to catch a peek at women doing a number
two would dress up like that to get a nice sniff.
And to make matters worse, he'll be equally as justified because
his "self identification" as a part-time fish is just
as reasonable as some guy who arbitrarily has invented the idea
he really is a woman trapped in a war on women
body. The only difference is one pervert is a
part time wanda wee wee wannabee and the other wants to make it
permanent (well, until he realizes it was a big mistake a decade
later and then regrets the chop-a-dick-tomy that he underwent -
not to mention the add-a-bobbies therapy he also received.
All of this is
after the word "gay" was stolen. Once
a happy and care-free word, "gay" was one of the first
victims of the leftists deciding to bastardize and to rape the
english language by stealing one word and to then repackage it
as the rainbow flagged bookmark for all things
homosexual. Instead of just going with
"queer" or "homosexual" (too honest a word),
gay was stolen and raped into submission to make homosexuals the
happy people they are now (unless they don't get their way and
then they want to slap you silly and call you a bigot or
homophobe). I personally am happy with being
called a fag or a queer - and since I am homosexual, I am fine
with that. Unfortunately I've been conditioned to
usurp the happiness from gay and to label myself that from time
to time - but that is when I get my elbow length white gloves
dirty or someone steals my pink bunny
slippers. |
No comments:
Post a Comment