But that equality cannot be considered as transient - shifting to the advantage of women when it suits them and then to be totally raped when women don't want to be held equal to men.
I first want to go head long into the discussion of sexual harassment.
At no time in this modern era has sexual harassment been legal or accepted. Throughout the employment process, both men and women are told what sexual harassment is, and most importantly, how to report sexual harassment and that at no time is a report of sexual harassment ever legally able to be followed by punitive actions by the employer.
So how is it that today's woman, the all-equal-all-the-time human get to claim they were victims of sexual harassment ten or twenty years ago and be able to be believed? Since the law requires them to report sexual harassment as it happens, the defense of "I was too afraid" of repercussions to report the situation doesn't hold water.
That is pure bullshit - women don't get to say they are too scared of retributions - men don't get to use that standard and thus women are using their perceived weaknesses to escape being held to the very same standards of conduct that men are always held to. Either you are equal and are bound to report the instances as they happen or you are not allowed to ever whine or accuse years afterwards. Equality carries with it responsibility. Equality doesn't give you a "get to accuse someone of sexual harassment card" years later when it suits your needs in the contemporary period as opposed to the historic one.
And how is it that women get to collect multiple instances of sexual harassment to keep in their scrapbook of vagina victimhood to use whenever it damn well suits them? It is not believable that a woman who was once subjected to conduct by a Neanderthal should ever get to claim such on a second or third instance when she fails to act on the first. There comes a situation where a woman OWNS being a victim of sexual predation when she allows the first action to go unreported. It should also be the law that if you fail to report the first instance, you don't get to ever cry wolf on any other situation. If you accept that you are weak piece of shit and you are a coward and you are spineless, then you deserve all the predation you reap.
I also want to go into the situation where men and women are dating or are in casual relationships like parties. In most of these situations that involve drinking, both the man and the woman are often drunk - yet only the woman gets to use her drunkeness as a defense for sexual relations while the man's drunkeness is never excuse for his sexual predation. A woman who can't hold her liquor or who chooses not to act like an adult and to stop drinking is fully able under the law to escape any responsibility for placing herself into a sexual mattress situation; the man, fully as drunk as she is, is bound to know when to stop - as if the virtue of owning a penis makes him more responsible to be able to stop than the slut who took her clothes off and imitated sexual relations.
I never contend here that raping a passed out person is just, but there is a sexual bias where women are not held to the same standards as men when there is a drunk state involved. If a woman cannot be considered able to consent to sex when they are drunk, then it should also follow that no man should be able to recognize the failure of the female to consent. Both are drunk, both are stupid ass mother fuckers, and both should bear the burdens of their actions to this point and both are on a level playing field for sex - if it happens, it happens. No woman should be able to hide her pathetic conduct up to this point to get out of the consequences of her actions. You drink, you get the shaft. Literally.
No comments:
Post a Comment