That is a word that you will never associate with the modern Democrat Party.
Democrats stand for unmitigated abortion because we all know that women have the ultimate control over their bodies. They can spread their legs, consent to being filled with a delicious peen, and then after consenting to the very act that makes something other than a penguin, women believe they have a mulligan on responsibility and get to kill the product of their sexual consent.
It is an odd standard that women get a do over when their initial consent for sex doesn't mean shit; when the sexual activity results in the "duh" event that happens when a load of semen is squirted in a vagina, women believe they have a right to change their mind and to remove the result of their actions.
They want to avoid responsibility.
The problem here with women's consent is that exercising control over one's body by deciding to allow a peen to enter IS CONTROL OVER ONE'S BODY. Exercising this control of yes and no has no impact on anyone else - no person's rights are trampled on - no due process is denied - and a woman decides to allow or not to allow a peen to enter. This is where personal responsibility enters along with the peen. Women aren't stupid even though they want us to believe they are when it matters and advances their cause; women know a peen is like a loaded gun - allow it to enter unsheathed and you can expect nature to take its course.
Duh.
Unfortunately when a woman seeks an extension of responsibility after the fact, that is not control over one's body - that is a control over natural processes that result from the failed act to take responsibility for entry. And women want to have a second bite of the fruit by claiming they alone determine the after effects of a hot load shot into a quivering vaginal canal.
Quite simply, women want a moral mulligan.
The problem here is that extending a woman's control over her body by ignoring her foolishness the first time, that we end up bumping into the rights of another human - the fetus. It might be one thing to afford a woman a do over if they had the responsibility to put this case before a judge and a jury where the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness were afforded the fetus; by giving the fetus the right to life and to have control over its own body, women would be at a minimum allowing the Constitution to mean something other than what women want it to say. To give the fetus the bare minimum of due process rights that we afford serial killers, we would be showing how just and great our country is - and that we respect children.
There is no way abortion is Constitutional - its very actions never involve due process - and Constitutional rights are limited when an exercise of one inhibits the exercise of constitutional rights by another human; we claim that even miscreant illegal aliens have due process rights, so how is it even logical to deny the most innocent who've broken no laws such protections? In a due process scenario, we could handle those cases of rape or incest or protecting the woman's life. But we don't get any due process at all for the fetus. The woman is the judge, the jury, and the executioner. Her spreading of her legs suddenly has any responsibility removed because she has fucker's remorse.
To compound the absurdity of abortion being a right, is the fact that women also seek the disgusting ability to control a boy's body by inflicting harm on his body without his legal consent; the butchery of circumcision goes beyond a religious cause; just like rape and incest are few and far between in the overall sixty million feti butchered by women, a boy has just as much right to control his body as does a woman; and if we are going to even suggest that a boy has the ultimate control over his body to become a chick on a whim, then no woman should ever be involved in the butchery of a boy against his consent. And women who do this, should be imprisoned for life if such control of one's body is as absolute as the abortion seeking whore would have us believe!
The Democrats want to play this game of two faced logic - they claim illegal aliens are immigrants and we should not inhibit their entry into this country and that we should afford them the constitutional protections CITIZENS have by birth; yet we deny feti the ability those rights!
Democrats, the party that ALONE has fought and sanctioned the death of 60 million feti, has the audacity to stand for blubbering children of those people who have violated American law the moment they put a foot on our soil. And with each passing second, they add counts of criminality to their stay and when we seek to detain these folks, Democrats suddenly love children when they can become props for their malignant view of America. To make matters worse, these very same blubbering Democrats did nothing when Barack Hussein Obama was wrapping children in foil and holding them behind chain link fences in former K-Marts.
Democrats have become a lawless bunch - they only believe in causes that advance their power and they choose to not be bound by the Constitution whatsoever. It is high time we now draw a line in the sand to Democrats and to punish them will all due disrespect - and if they seek to intimidate us or to extort us or to kill more unborn while slobbering over human carry on baggage brought by illegal aliens, there can be no compromise with such lawlessness. There comes a time when such treachery is matched with the administration of revolution. And I dare Democrats to bring a knife to this gunfight.
No comments:
Post a Comment