Make no mistake here, this is a temper tantrum at the expense of 63 million Americans and with so much permanent damage to the Constitution that America might as well consider this the second Civil War. For what the females and nutless men in the Democrat party have just done is to make it so any action by any President is a crime against the Constitution.
And just wait until the next nutless Democrat becomes President.
Impeachment will happen so fast that your head will spin.
And just for fun, multiple impeachments will happen in rapid fire succession since an idiot nutless democrat has already offered that this can happen.
Who knew that the nuclear option of Impeachment could be the Christmas gift that keeps on giving?
Weeks ago, the Democrat party led by Nancy "Twig with Tits" Pelosi and her minions, Adam Shitt and Jerrold "The Wadler" Nadler, had taken the queer action of focus group testing what "crime" they'd charge the President with when it became obvious that "Quid Pro Quo" was beyond the intelligence level of the average Democrat voter.
"Bribery" became the official crime that the Democrats gleefully (with much sorrow masking their near orgasmic release) ran with so sure that they could contrive a case for bribery that their intellectually deficient base could grasp (and possibly could spell four times out of ten). And with that glee of latching onto a crime that was also in the Constitution (one out of ten Democrat voters could tell you that the Constitution was a document crafted during slave times - the other nine Democrat voters couldn't tell you what Constitution really was), the Democrats knew they had the President by his peanuts and soon they could contrive a case of "high crimes" that would even attract RINO's (Republicans in Name Only).
And like the most focus-group-tested product in history, the Ford Edsel, the Democrats efforts to contrive a case of bribery fell flat as even their cherry-picked from the Shitt Basement could not prove there was ever a bribe taken even if they tried to pimp out "do me a favor" to prove a crime of bribery.
The Democrats have been skilled with a 100% fact free crime exploration - in the July 25th now infamous Trump/Ukrainian telephone conversation, the Democrats somehow crafted a fable (not unlike Shitt did in fabricating the actual phone call) that Trump was referring to the 2020 election when he had mentioned the DNC server "crossfire" and about situations he faced in politics. Now, the entire speech is available for even stupid and lazy Democrat voters, but the entirety of that message had nothing to do with the 2020 election. Biden, Burisma, Hunter the Drug Addict, nor ANY 2020 candidate was mentioned; Trump clearly was referring to the 2016 situation in which he faced numerous "criminal" actions committed by Obama officials and DNC operatives. In fact, the investigations conducted since 2015 have focused on foreign intervention into campaigns and the Ukraine was no innocent party that was any different from the Ruskies - albeit Ukraine was clearly more intellectually lame than the Ruskies. But if foreign interference in elections was so criminal, then former President Hussein Obama should be retroactively impeached for spending American tax dollars in the Israeli election in 2015 and 2016 - a documented and proven fact. So for all of the Democrats excuses for the Hillary implosion in 2016, having Ruskies causing her loss was pale in comparison to her incompetently run campaign leaving an unprotected firewall of Pennsylvania, Michigan, et al vulnerable to the dolt Trump. Ukraine did in fact act to involve themselves to advance a Democrat narrative in 2016 and the lack of curiosity by the DNC's propaganda wing, the Mainstream Media, means jack shit. The DNC silence on Ukraine being a bad actor in our election in 2016 is not surprising since that situation didn't support the narrative of the hate against Donald Trump.
So after the Russian Collusion case fell apart as Bobby Mueller barely was awake enough to attend his infamous hearing on his report, the Democrats needed something to fall back on - so they knew that the indignant Deep State Department of State was annoyed enough that their status quo was threatened by changes that the dolt Trump had made that they were willing to sell out their country to save their precious diplomatic inertia of pandering to the Global State rather than the United States. And when the time was right to pick the fruit to impeach Trump, friends and acquaintances and former co-workers from Democrat offices conspired to create the narrative of a whistleblower and that this was the insurance policy needed to pin Donald Trump to an inverted cross and to finally get rid of him for once and all. The problem is that the Whistleblower story fell apart very quickly - he shopped his story to the Adam Shitt office (and somehow Shitt never met the clown - almost as funny as Obama spending 20 years in a black racist church and never hearing a sermon!) And since it is now fact that the Democrat entanglement with this story of the phone call is far greater than they want us to know, the Whistleblower is being hidden so he doesn't spill the beans on how complicit the Democrats were in fabricating the entire narrative of a quid pro quo and bribery story.
Enter the Twat, Nancy Pelosi, who was playing both sides of the fence like she couldn't decide if she preferred fish or peen, and she was trying to tamp down the rise of the Rancid Cunt Squad comprised of an idiot and two dirty snatch Mooslim cunts who have both serious ethics issues as well as mouths that are so unclean that you'd likely want to kiss a pussy than kiss them on the lips.
And while Nancy played coy with the impeachment, she signaled off camera that she was going to get Trump just to appease the dirty cunt squad and their minions. After seeing fat ass Nadler (though he's about a hundred pounds less fat) botch the Mueller report hearing, she grabbed another ball-less asshole named Adam Shitt and had him play prosecutor, judge, and jury in the basement and then to audition the best liars to see who could tell the biggest line of shit for public consumption. Mind you, none of the shit liars would ever be the Whistleblower who was protected so viciously by Shitt et al that one wonders if he had pictures of Shitt and the Vienna Boys choir practicing playing skin flutes. And with the casting couch auditions with Shitt completed (picture that without vomiting), the Shitt Show was released for the eager public to consume. And with each day of testimony the audience for the hearings became smaller than MSNBC's top demographic penetration in their audience. The problem with the cherry-picked liars was that you can't prove that the President said jack when you had to hear it from someone who heard it from someone who heard it from someone who wasn't even there when the phone call was made. The Democrat game of telephone became the laughing stock when the liars were asked point blank if they had even talked to the President or heard him utter "quid pro quo" (or bribery). At one hearing the silence to the question was so deafening that crickets were heard answering for them.
With Russian Collusion, Quid Pro Quo, and Bribery failing to make the cut to get Trump Impeached for the Great American Christmas present, the Democrats were left with Obstruction of Congress and Abuse of Power - both laughable pussy ass charges that would hold as much water as a bottomless bucket.
First, the audacity of these Democrats ball-less asswipes thinking that exercising a Constitutional right to go to court is obstruction of anything is laughable. Even mere peeons have the right to go to court to slow down an investigation and that is the right of even the boldest mass murdering Mooslim not related to the Stank Cunt Squad of Talib et al. There is no crime to go to court to slow down an investigation even if the intent is to slow down an investigation - an innocent person can slow down an investigation to ensure facts are found and their ducks are in a row over malicious prosecution and Congress is not a superior power to the Presidency - hence what Congress wants means jack shit until a court rules on whether Congress gets information. Congress and the police are not guaranteed a speedy investigation and the Democrat indignation toward Trump's court actions is pale in comparison to the Democrats' laziness in waiting for a court to act like what happened in Watergate and Nixon's eventual resignation.
Quite simply, there is no crime in what Trump did in obstructing a vicious, hate-filled, the day after inauguration impeachment witch hunt that Democrats sought after Trump took his first breath as President. Make no mistake here, there is no sorrow in the hearts of the assholes in the Democrat party who have sought impeachment. There is pure 100% hate that ends up having an impeachment so low in standard that every President from this day forward will be guilty of impeachable offenses after they take their hand off the bible in Januaries for the next hundred years.
This is a cunty, spiteful, twat infested emotional action that is like your dog picking your shoes and shitting in them leaving them for you to step in its shit. There is no crime, high or low, for taking Congressional subpoenas to court when you have been hunted for impeachment since one second after you became President (and some Democrats wanted him impeached after winning the election). Congress has no right and no expectation of having any witness subpoena answered after it is issued. If Congress is so desirous of the person to testify, then they can take the President to court and to force his hand. These lazy ass traitors were so lazy that they couldn't be bothered to take the President to court - they had to have the impeachment scarlet letter on Trump as soon as possible so that they could interfere in the 2020 election (read that again and tell me that isn't the pot calling the kettle black!?)
And with the Obstruction of Congress really meaning that Trump was trying to slow things down from being impeached in the quickest impeachment in history, no crime of any kind was committed by Trump. He has rights - no man is below the law - and despite the spin of the Democrats looking all solemn as they placed a dagger in Trump's ribs, claiming no man is above the law is laughable since apparently Joe Biden and his son are both protected from being investigated and held to account for their personal profit off the tax payers and a threat to withhold military aid in six hours unless a prosecutor had been fired (proved by Joe Biden boasting to that effect). So, let the pussy asses on the Democrat party shove their words of "no man is above the law" when they protect their own and treat Trump to the lowest standard of rights protected - illegal aliens get more protection by Democrats - and police killers? Well, those black lives matters guys get far more protection and rights afforded than the Democrats give President Trump.
The other Article that the cunts from the Democrat party have offered is "abuse of power" - a queer twist considering that it was routine for President Obama to take an act of Congress and to reinvent it for his political power and profit - countless times he took the rules passed by Congress on Obamascare and he exempted this company or union from the provisions without a hearing or Congressional input; you see without his abuse of his Presidential power stealing Congressional authority for his re-election, Obamascare would have failed before his second term had started.
Once again, we go back to the lie that the July 25th phone call was about the 2020 election - abuse of power in the hindsight of a man wronged from the start is a defense of his rights, it is not about the upcoming election in anyway. And since none of the concepts discussed in that phone call even mentions or alludes to 2020 (Biden is never mentioned), then the abuse of power is bogus and a complete fabrication. What power of the Presidency did Trump abuse? Delaying foreign aid? He routinely has made it his case to slow down all aid. There is nothing new here folks. And since he had personally experienced backstabbing by Ukraine, their sainthood was not recognized by him - and he had reason to doubt these fake Russians were less like the Sopranos and more like the Mickey Mouse club. Abuse of power to question the ethics of another foreign power who spent considerable effort trying to sabotage his own election? Oh, please. And now we have seen Congress commit the very actions of abuse of power with subpoenas to go after members of congress, the press, and other private citizens and nary a whimper over their "no man is above the law".
And so now we have the case of the weakest and most cunty impeachment in history - and when the next Democrat is elected to the Presidency, we have an obligation to hunt him/her down and to treat that miscreant with no less contempt than has been shown Trump. And should Congress go back to the Republicans and the Senate the same, it is the duty of Congress to revoke the impeachment of Trump and to set the record right and to string up the Democrat conspirators for the treason they have committed and to let them hang for the duration of the second term of Trump. No person is above the law and those who acted in this treason should pay for all to see their corpses rotting and picked apart by birds and eaten by hordes of rats.
And what would prevent Republicans, after taking over Congress, from arresting the conspirators, and then charge them and to impeach them and to take their asses to the Senate for an endless set of trials to remove them from office - and then the moment they are exercised from their job, they are hauled off to the gallows where they can hang naked?
No comments:
Post a Comment