Ever since Barack Hussein Obama concocted the son of a poor non-Kenyan sharecropper story that he used to evade responsibility for attending a black supremacist church in Chicago for over 20 years (in his version of he didn't inhale the words), King Pimple has fancied himself as the champion of all things black and racist toward white men.

He's even suggested that he cares about the poor even as he allows a mass invasion of wage-lowering disease carrying rapist, child molesters, and drunk drivers, it is rather odd that when the King throws a party, he seems to never invite those whom he exploits for his political power - the poor.

Oddly, the only people who seem to get to go to the 995th party thrown at taxpayer expense are the donors who have thrown millions of dollars at him and his cunt wife, Moochie Belle.   You won't find anyone who has less than a six digit annual income at a party thrown by Moochie Belle and her stiff husband, King Pimple of a Man. 

The poor are props.

The rich get to eat with the King and Queen.    Hollywood invaded Washington and suddenly California had the net worth of the Bronx.

The poor don't even get to eat cake.

We also have to remember that during the eight years of the reign of terror on the Constitution that is the Obama years, that the taxpayers have also supported and paid for the upkeep and kennel fees of Moochie Belle's mother - a woman who hangs around like she's got a basement apartment where she eats the finest and doesn't ever have to worry about being booted onto the streets with the rest of women who don't have any other visibile means of support.

And so it ends, the Obama years - poor people used as props - blacks being used for political gain while they experience record poverty and unemployment, and Moochie Belle wearing all the costume jewelry she can wrap around her neck to hide her Adam's Apple.

While King Pimple of a Man and Queen Moochelle Antoinette lectured Americans to share in the sacrifice during the early stages of the Great Recession, the Obamas were living high on the hog.    Recently Queen Moochelle Antoinette took a ski trip with two of her dogs, Mothra and Sasquatch, and the transportation alone cost the taxpayers $57,000 while King Pimple went elsewhere to play golf adding more expenses.

To add insult to injury, the Obama's have traveled more often than any other First Couple and have even brought extra baggage with them in the form of Queen Mooch's mother.    And yes, the First Couple have in fact travelled more at more expense than any other President - 31 trips that have cost a minimum of $44 million and have logged 119 days on trips - Ronald Reagan at this same point in his Presidency traveled 14 times for 73 days.

Moochelle Antoinette ran her trap making promises she didn't even bother to champion as she

forced your children to go hungry at lunch with her incessant meddling into parental roles.

The un-elected shrew, cunt, and yeast infected vajayjay owner is imposing standards on your children's lunch that she will not and does not impose on her own brood of brats.    Read about Moochelle Antoinette's disgusting invasion of your childrens' eating habits.

Early September polls had the Senate fallling for the Democrats - but that coincided with a spike in Democrat only commercials.   Now that the Republicans are matching the pace of the Democrats through election day, the Democrat retention of the Senate is now possible - it is entirely likely.   Read about the Scare Crow as she offers the doomsday scenario.

The Campaign for Junk Food Michelle Obama on Attempts to Roll Back Healthy Reforms by Moochelle Antoinette rebuttal by UV WHEN we began our Let’s Move! initiative four years ago, we set one simple but ambitious goal: to end the epidemic of childhood obesity in a generation so that kids born today will grow up healthy. And since I'm an unelected and unemployed lawyer, I have nothing better to do than to tell parents that I know better than they do about how to raise their children.   Right now I can't send the food police into their homes, but I can get their snotty brats to eat what I tell them to eat while in Government Schools. To achieve this goal, we have adhered to one clear standard: what works. The initiatives we undertake are evidence-based, and we rely on the most current science. Research indicated that kids needed less sugar, salt and fat in their diets, so we revamped school lunch menus accordingly. When data showed that the lack of nearby grocery stores negatively affected people’s eating habits, we worked to get more fresh-food retailers into underserved areas. Studies on habit formation in young children drove our efforts to get healthier food and more physical activity into child care centers. Evidence-based?   Where?   At no time has the Federal Government mandated a school lunch menu predicated only on the assertions of a power hungry first lady who thinks she knows better than the other 100 million mothers in the country! Today, we are seeing glimmers of progress. Tens of millions of kids are getting better nutrition in school; families are thinking more carefully about food they eat, cook and buy; companies are rushing to create healthier products to meet the growing demand; and the obesity rate is finally beginning to fall from its peak among our youngest children. Today we have children refusing to eat Government Meals and going home starving and eating what their mothers have been feeding them.    Perhaps in the land of polyester water buffalo mothers there is no sense of nutrition, but in the world outside of Obama voters, there is common sense. So we know that when we rely on sound science, we can actually begin to turn the tide on childhood obesity. When a leftist says they are relying on science,  you know they pulled the methodology out of their asses and it is based on emotion, not facts and certainly not based on science! But unfortunately, we’re now seeing attempts in Congress to undo so much of what we’ve accomplished on behalf of our children. Take, for example, what’s going on now with the Women, Infants and Children program, known as WIC. This is a federal program designed to provide supplemental nutrition to low-income women and their babies and toddlers. The idea is to fill in the gaps in their diets — to help them buy items like fresh produce that they can’t afford on their own — and give them the nutrition they’re missing. How dare Congress think they know more about your kids than I do! Right now, the House of Representatives is considering a bill to override science by mandating that white potatoes be included on the list of foods that women can purchase using WIC dollars. Now, there is nothing wrong with potatoes. The problem is that many women and children already consume enough potatoes and not enough of the nutrient-dense fruits and vegetables they need. That’s why the Institute of Medicine — the nonpartisan, scientific body that advises on the standards for WIC — has said that potatoes should not be part of the WIC program. It is kinda funny to think that the common potato has now become public enemy number 1.3 after white men and guns. Unfortunately, this isn’t an isolated occurrence. We’re seeing the same kind of scenario unfold with our school lunch program. Back in 2010, Congress passed the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act, which set higher nutritional standards for school lunches, also based on recommendations from the Institute of Medicine. Today, 90 percent of schools report that they are meeting these new standards. As a result, kids are now getting more fruits, vegetables, whole grains and other foods they need to be healthy. Understand that "getting" is not "eating".    Today's children are taking Moochie's vegetables and are dumping them uneaten in the trash can.    Moochie's program has increased wasted food by tens of percentage points while their are hungry children around the world without a hashtag moment. This is a big win for parents who are working hard to serve their kids balanced meals at home and don’t want their efforts undermined during the day at school. And it’s a big win for all of us since we spend more than $10 billion a year on school lunches and should not be spending those hard-earned taxpayer dollars on junk food for our children. Parents know ahead of time what the menu is - and my mother would pack a lunch for me when she didn't want me to eat the stuff or I didn't like it.    How is it that you have the audacity, you cunt, to presuppose you know better and that other parents don't have common sense, you focking cow! Yet some members of the House of Representatives are now threatening to roll back these new standards and lower the quality of food our kids get in school. They want to make it optional, not mandatory, for schools to serve fruits and vegetables to our kids. They also want to allow more sodium and fewer whole grains than recommended into school lunches. These issues will be considered when the House Appropriations Committee takes up the annual spending bill for the Agriculture Department on Thursday. In other words, Congress is trying to show me up! Remember a few years ago when Congress declared that the sauce on a slice of pizza should count as a vegetable in school lunches? You don’t have to be a nutritionist to know that this doesn’t make much sense. Yet we’re seeing the same thing happening again with these new efforts to lower nutrition standards in our schools. And remember when your husband blamed the invasion of law-abiding citizens' tax returns as actions by a few rogue agents? Our children deserve so much better than this. Even with the progress we have made, one in three children in this country is still overweight or obese. One in three is expected to develop diabetes in his or her lifetime. And this isn’t just about our children’s health; it’s about the health of our economy as well. We already spend an estimated $190 billion a year treating obesity-related conditions. Just think about what those numbers will look like in a decade or two if we don’t start solving this problem now. Our children need you to shut the hell up, tend to your garden and your own brood of twiggie children and to get out of the school lunch program - you have no training and no competence in nutrition; but then again, when you have the last name "Obama" competence is not something you would know about. The bottom line is very simple: As parents, we always put our children’s interests first. We wake up every morning and go to bed every night worrying about their well-being and their futures. And when we make decisions about our kids’ health, we rely on doctors and experts who can give us accurate information based on sound science. Our leaders in Washington should do the same. Obama propaganda was published in the Obama Times

First lady Michelle Obama is encouraging students to monitor their older relatives, friends and co-workers for any racially insensitive comments they might make, and to challenge those comments whenever they’re made. We all know that there is only one kind of racism, so the first shrew was not communicating to black youth to get their relatives to stop using cracka or to tell them to stop blaming their failure on white people. The first lady spoke on Friday to graduating high school students in Topeka, Kansas, and in remarks released over the weekend, Obama said students need to police family and friends because federal laws can only go so far in stopping racism. Michelle Obama race graduation speech “[O]ur laws may no longer separate us based on our skin color, but nothing in the Constitution says we have to eat together in the lunchroom, or live together in the same neighborhoods,” she said. “There’s no court case against believing in stereotypes or thinking that certain kinds of hateful jokes or comments are funny.” To address these limitations in the law, Obama asked students to take steps to “drag my generation and your grandparents’ generation along with you” in the fight against racism. “Maybe that starts simply in your own family, when grandpa tells that off-colored joke at Thanksgiving, or you’ve got an aunt [that] talks about ‘those people,’” she said. “Well, you can politely inform them that they’re talking about your friends. “Or maybe it’s when you go off to college and you decide to join a sorority or fraternity, and you ask the question, how can we get more diversity in our next pledge class?” she added. “Or maybe it’s years from now, when you’re on the job and you’re the one who asks, do we really have all the voices and viewpoints we need at this table? “But no matter what you do, the point is to never be afraid to talk about these issues, particularly the issue of race,” she said. Obama’s remarks focused on race because they were meant to highlight the 60th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s Brown v. Board of Education decision, which said it was unconstitutional for states to establish separate public schools for black and white students. While Obama praised the student body for being racially diverse, she said segregation is happening again in some parts of the country, as some people are moving away and leaving city schools.  She said that is leading to segregation that is as bad as it was decades ago. Please note she did not mention race-based groups like the NAACP, United Negro College Fund, Congressional Black Caucus, the Rainbow Coalition, Jesse Jackass, Al Sharpton, or Black Colleges which implement race-based segregation and collect millions to spread racism while whining about it.    These groups ensure that racism exists because, without it, there would be no need for them.   The race-baiting industry is okay to self-segregate and to promote overt racial hatred.   Content of character is missing in action here - just judge on the color of the skin. “So today, by some measures, our schools are as segregated as they were back when Dr. King gave his final speech,” she said. Obama originally planned to speak to students on the graduation day, but in late April the White House agreed that she would speak at a “senior recognition day” after students protested her arrival. Many students argued that the first lady’s speech on graduation day would overshadow their graduation and make it harder for students to bring their own families to the ceremony. Article is from The Blaze with the indented italicized comments inserted by the blog author.