Ultraviolet Thunderpussy's View: Commentary, Vintage Male Photos, Videos.

It doesn't take much balls to be a leftist and Bob Costas has proved to be testicularly challenged.   At best, Costas in his insults toward the Washington Redskins has proved he is a weak and spineless rat bastard who cannot stand on his own two feet and to distance himself from the mindless racist drivel that is gaining traction in this country.    At worst, Costas is a closet racist - transferring his own racial tendencies upon the rest of us and has found an easy way to assuage his white guilt by slamming others for doing exactly what he lives. Costas' analysis (posted in the video above) is contradictory and blatantly misguided.   On the one hand he freely admits that a majority of indians (I do not accept the politically correct blather of "native americans since they aren't native and came from somewhere else) don't have any issue with the Washington Redskins.    This is important since the group that would be most "offended" is not offended.     The discussion should end there.   But Costas then does what is the trick of day and tries to equate this to calling black people the "n" word. It should be noted immediately that there is no Constitutional right for you to be free from being offended.    You don't have the right to demand never to be offended nor do you have any grounds to tell someone to stop saying or doing things that offend you.    You simply have no right to live offense free.   And as such your nose out of joint on any occasion is meaningless and should never cause any action to result against another citizen or entity. I wondered how "Redskins" is really offensive to indians.    If I walked up to Joe Q Indian and say "Hey, Mr Redskin" how is that an insult to that indian?     Considering the lengths that the gay community has taken to hijack the word "gay" and to shift the meaning from "happy" to "homosexual" how is it that we cannot give the latitude to the word "Redskin" that now shifts from a supposed derogatory word for indian to a sports team?    In common usage, the use of "redskin" to utter a racial slur like the "n" word is so miniscule that I bet it never happens but once or twice per year in the entire country!    And since we can redefine words at a whim in the world of this leftist infection in our nation where we bastardize "marriage" to suit our narrow and bigoted view, then how can we stick with the 1880's interpretation of "redskin" in 2013?    It seems that the left wants to be able to redefine words on their own terms and then to hold narrow interpretations when it suits their narrow and illogical perspective! This is not the first time that Bob Costas has opened his trap to spill out the leftist progressive ideology.   Back in December last year he jumped on the anti-gun bandwagon that was all the rage with American hating leftists.    It should not come as a surprise that Costas would then exploit another cause of the leftists, racial division and punishment over unsubstantiated prior crimes, in this instance with the Redskins. Costas appears to logically set up his angst for the Redskins with a skill that most knuckle dragging leftists are unable to do, but when Costa then makes the leap that if a sports team were named using a known racial slur against blacks and other racially protected subclasses, this really was a jump to far in logic. We all know that blacks routinely call themselves the "n" word.    This is not even up for debate - they seem to find that the use of the word is perfectly acceptable in their street language and even permeates rap music.    And while the use of the "n" word by non-blacks does showcase the ignorance of those using it, I fail to grasp the concept that blacks are victims of a word that is offensive.    When one is offended by a word or phrase, you  don't use it.   When you use it, you own it, and you throw out any claim to the offensiveness of the word.    What has happened, as a result, is that blacks use the "n" word as a wedge issue - when someone else uses it, they use that as a weapon against others - not to protest the offensiveness, but to justify their black status of victimhood.    It is quite a game these days where the use of race as a power wedge is exploited for political reasons all the way up to the White House.   And it is quite common for members of the black community when they are playing on teams to call each other the "n" word - so let's not kid ourselves - this parochial ownership of the "n" word is laughable.    The Washington Redskins' background is extensive with the respect of the Indian culture and even the current logo pictured above is far less "racially offensive" than the Cleveland Indians which is stereotypical and blatantly offensive to even me.   The Redskins make no such attempt to offend with their logo yet this escapes those whites who have nothing better to do than to transfer their own internal battle with bigotry onto the rest of us.   And this is where Bob Costas emerges as a prick of a magnitude few ever achieve.   Not only is his position illogical, it is misguided and uninformed.   And with his history of being a puppet for the Progressive cause of the day, we can dismiss him as a political hack.