The Death Rattle of a Major Political Party

I suppose we should not be surprised that the party who has insulted and raped our Constitution and has applauded lawless behavior by a President from their own party would not accept the rule of law in the election of Donald Trump as President.

We've heard their Democrat shit so much that it is getting nauseating.

Motha Focka Democrats - we are NOT A DEMOCRACY.

I know you keep saying this (and only when it is to your advantage), but our Founding Fathers did not create a more perfect union in the form of a Democracy.

And perhaps you assholes should be the ones thanking Jesus that we don't have a Democracy.

Democracy is mob rule - minorities don't matter.   In a perfect Democracy, Black Lives Wouldn't Mean Shit to anyone here.    Illegal aliens wouldn't matter jack shit.    And mooslims would be fleeing this nation to go to live with Ice Piss.

And just think for a minute you lame ass Democrat whining voters - if we were a Democracy do you seriously think you could have hijacked the term "marriage" into one that is only applied to two people regardless of gender?   Your actions there fly in the face of Democracy and you know it.   You defiled Democracy to get this because if the majority of people did not want gay people to redefine the term, you would never have had the chance.

There is a reason we don't have mob rule.

First, a plurality of people thinking one way is not a good thing - it will always punish minority thought.    As long as one extra person believes in one way, the majority would always rule.   And black people would still be saying "massa" to Democrat slave owners.

Second, we have a representative government - we vote on people to represent us.   They make decisions for us.   We have no say on any policy in the voting stage.   We can whine and moan, and maybe the Congress will listen to us, but really, they can and do what they want.

Third, the electoral college is the same operating principle - we don't need a misinformed majority making decisions for our President.   We default to our states (which are more important than the Federal Government according to our Founding Fathers).    We have those state elections and the candidates must win a plurality of the electors that are rewarded for winning a state.   That is a great thing so that those who have been told lies by our media don't get to overwhelm us by a lawless state like California that makes dog shit into a legal voter.

I have news for Democrats - you are not guaranteed to win.    If you lose, you should accept your loss and move on and improve your message.    Just because you are a lawless, constitution-raping party that seeks to bribe voters with free stuff and to continue to enslave black people on your plantation, that does not give you the right to demand we implement aspects of Democracies.

I know it hurts to lose - I felt like the world ended when the jerk Obama was elected and I was spot on right about what a fraud and disaster he was as a President.    Having to choose between incompetence or intentional destruction of the country is not a choice I want to make about a President's intentions.

Yes, your precious Obama's lawless actions will be undone.   He acted outside of the law and much of his shit can be reversed with a stroke of a pen.

So shove it, Democrats.

If you are so spineless as to not accept Donald Trump as your President, you can always cut your wrists. 

During the Presidential debates of this election cycle, one thing is clear.

If you are a motivated, hard-working person, you are the enemy of Hillary Clinton.

How can I say that?    Hillary said she would not raise taxes on the Middle Class or the poor and she'd give your kids free college and nothing would impact the deficit at all.

And the Middle Earth and Hobbits are real.

Bullshit!

Let us understand this very clearly - even if you seized all of the assets of the 1%, you could not pay off the national debt that we have incurred over the past 240 years.     Simply raising taxes on the rich who already pay over half the federal income taxes paid by individuals even to 99% of income earned would not pay off the debt incurred by President Obama in his eight years of terror on our country.

So it is dishonest (fancy that) for Hillary to use the usual leftist shit that she'll soak the rich so that the poor and middle class can get free shit.

What Hillary and the Democrats are advocating is called "Trickle Up Economics" - by stealing the wealth of the rich and giving it to the poor, it is said that the masses will suddenly be more intelligent, prudent, and wise with their life choices and the economy would boom like we've never seen before.

The problem with this economic policy of "Trickle Up Economics" is that it doesn't exist.

Here's why.

Everyone makes life choices that may or may not be wise.     There are just as many stupid rich people as there are stupid poor people - the stupid rich likely inherited their wealth and blow it - look at the likelihood of the average NFL or NBA player - they get millions in their short careers and end up filing for bankruptcy - they buy depreciating assets like cars and/or squander it on friends, drugs, booze, or sluts.    What houses they buy are foreclosed on because their income is squandered so that the one smart idea they had can't be sustained.   Look at those on welfare - they continue to reproduce without any concern for their ability to pay because they know they don't have to pay - you will be forced to do so.    These are the same people who will spend $2500 on rims to put on a car that has a $500 loan value.   These are the same people who will not forgo their urges to have the best smartphone when they can't afford the electric bill.

And suddenly we are going to think these poor asswipes are going to rise up with intelligence once they have money taken from the rich and given to them?

These are the same asswipes who whine that they are making minimum wage.   These are the same asswipes who in high school dressed up in athleticware and fancied themselves the next big NBA star.    So they didn't learn jack.   They only know how to hump or take a peen and how to multiply in utero.   These jerks have no skills, no critical thinking, can't add or subtract in their heads, and think they are owed things because they are poor.

Now it is true that there are poor people who are motivated.   And these are the same poor people who usually don't accept government assistance - they do things the old fashioned way - they get off their asses, skin their knees by trying, and ultimately pull their own asses out of the gutter instead of being sent to the Democrat Plantation for Perpetual victims.

Throwing money at the poor has not done jack - we have the highest poverty rate in decades under this Administration - black poverty and unemployment is higher now than it ever was under George W. Bush.

Trickle Up Economics pre-supposes that the Government knows better than the rich how to spend their money.    So instead of spending money on big ticket items, investing in businesses, hiring people, or building new expensive homes, the Government takes that money and gives it to the masses to spend on hoes, drugs, alcohol, and other vices while there is nothing gained by the economy in those one time purchases; when the rich buy a new expensive car, they pay for the salesman, the other workers, and the other business's overhead; that money then travels "down" to others.   When a poor person spends $250 on a new tv, it is small potatoes; even if 10,000 deadbeats were to spend that money on a new tv, that is a one time purchase.   These are not appreciating assests.   These are disposable items.    A smart rich person in this example would invest $250k in a new home downpayment that will generate taxes to the local authorities, have a return on the investment during the sale - creating more wealth.    That $250 tv with the poor will be lucky to be worth $50 in five years - or even functional.

Making tuition free is a big mistake.    Just like when you make it so people have health insurance and you pay for routine and mundane things, there will be a higher amount of demand on services - services with finite resources - and the cost will increase and the motivation to increase costs will increase.    We already know that since Government has become more heavily involved in Tuition and student loan assistance, that the costs for college have skyrocketed.   And since Universities are more likely than not to just raise tuition when the costs can be paid for by bilking students into taking out loans, if we make it so every schmuck can go to college tuition free, it will cause and explosion of costs.   And since Universities are leftist institutions, they won't care if they raise costs - someone else will pay for it.

I became a first time voter in the 1980 election - I lived through the Jimmy Carter economy where interest rates were in double digits - where inflation was the same - and unemployment was hitting that mark as well.

Jimmy Carter was not a trickle down economic believer.

But Ronald Reagan was.

Within four years - his first term, the trend of exploding interest, unemployment, and inflation had been reversed.    Putting money in the hands of those who succeed worked.   And in four more years Reagan had made it an entrenched economic pattern of success.  Democrats lie - that is what they do - Reagan's trickle down worked for the masses - you cannot uplift those who are lazy - they will always have their hands out and are perfectly willing to continue to do things so that they can get a hand out.    We saw what happened when you raise taxes like President H.W. Bush did - a then record increase that he enacted that violated his "read my lips ... no new taxes" pledge.

In the 1990's, the economic growth under Clinton was actually no better than Bush - but in 1996 there was a world glut of oil - oil prices decreased - the economy picked up - and there was the boom in dot.coms.    Nothing here was a product of a Democrat policy.    It was not until Clinton was forced by Republicans to control spending and to decrease taxes that the surpluses that we are said to have produced ever happened.    Read this loud and clear - had the Republicans and Gingrich not done what they had done, there would have been no budget surplus ever.

Unfortunately for America, we elected G.W. Bush - a fake conservative and a guy who wanted to look big to avenge the death threat against his father.    September 11th happened and stalled all economic growth (that had already stalled in the last six months of Clinton).     And then the progressive infestation started - the banks collapsed because they were forced to give loans to people who couldn't afford them because of extortion by people like private citizen lawyer Barack Obama and his ilk that claimed (wrongfully) that minorities were denied loans; what was the really happening was that loans in areas of poor home values weren't being made - and since the poor migrate to low rent areas, they lowered property values and made it worthless to offer loans to those zip codes.    It was not race or ethnicity per se that was the problem, it was the geographic clustering of deadbeats and low income people.    But Democrats love to invent crises (while hiding their own).   And so we ended up having to loan to the people who couldn't afford them and they folded.

Bill Clinton is the clown who allowed banks to get into the cluster fuck mortgage backed securities by eliminating the Depression era law that forbid it.   Republicans had nothing to do with this.    And so banks do what they do - they are greedy  and they hid dogshit in between a few good pieces of paper and sold these mortgage backed securities.   And then when the economy was tightening up and the poor who could not afford jack started to fold, there was a cascade of failures - the dog shit which were these mortgages became worthless and then there was a cascade of greedy rich people having paper that was worthless.   Then they couldn't afford things and the cascade in the latter half of 2008 happened.

Ironically one of the extortionists of banks that created this mess, Barack Obama, became President and started whining he inherited a bad economy - he didn't just drop into the office - he asked to be President - so he inherited nothing - but he exploited this to pad the federal budget baseline by one trillion and has repeatedly overspent by over $1 trillion each year (thus his $9 trillion additional debt); Hillary Clinton claimed that Obama cut the deficit by 2/3rds but he did not cut the total debt.   Going from $1.1 trillion in deficits to $550 billion is not even good news - that is malfeasance!

The net here is that the Federal Government cannot spend its way into economic prosperity - stealing people's money to give to someone else is a one time transaction that will not replicate in the following years.

America is coming unglued.

Instead of seeking the commonality among us and seeking to celebrate our exceptionalism as a culture that is a melting pot, we have a modern movement here where we are having the diverse elements poured off and collected.

It is a war of celebrating diversity and making a common shared culture the enemy.

This is a destructive cultural phenom.    It is divisive.   It is corrosive.   It is the beginning of a civil war of the misfits against those without a malady with which to exploit in the face of the other smaller parts.

Today it is the vogue thing to do - to boil down our culture into its most minute and unsavory elements - everyone has a malady and everyone is a victim - and when we can separate out the smallest of victims to wage war against the greater assembly, it is so easy to create the heart ache that the masses do punish the smallest downtrodden.

The most ignorant of us and the most insidious of power players have assembled the case that America is a Democracy and that the largest numbers should win in elections regardless that our system was intentionally crafted to not yield to the runaway mob of stupidity and ignorance.   Our system is perfectly crafted to act as a barrier to mob rule in its election of representatives and the stratification of how both houses of congress shall work.   And with the crafting of a triad of governance, the legislature, the executive, and the judiciary, we further find checks and balances to the mob rule that our founding fathers found so abhorrent and lethal to a nation.

It is quite a quandry that we find ourselves - the very same insidious powers who seek to pour off our differences into little factions to point fingers at the masses are the very same two-faced assholes who claim that we are democracy.

Read that again.   Exploiters of our differences seek to pander to the masses.   And this is only done to secure and to maintain power.

We have an infestation of uncontrolled invaders disguised as immigration.    We have the carefully orchestrated campaign to drive wedges between classes - to pit the poor against the very people who pay most of the taxes; we have the black against the white; the gay against the straight; and now we are devolving our collective culture into smaller fragments where the gender speculators are now uplifted as a group to protect when their overall makeup of our society is barely a pin prick of blood on our collective societal body.

It is also queer that those who seek to pour off the different elements of our American society through pressure and heat are the very same people who routinely piss on individual liberty.

For you see, there is no power that can be maintained by letting each person be his own person; we cannot fabricate a war on women if we expect each person to pick his or her own ass off the ground in order to improve themselves.    There can be no exploitation of people when you can't group them into disparate pockets of causes - you can't whip up compassion for the poor if you hold each person accountable for poor decisions - buying expensive rims for a nearly valueless car - or by humping without condoms when you can't even feed yourself.    Or by making the rest of us miserable when we use the toilet so that the four or five in the country who are currently made uncomfortable because they have to use the toilet of their birth gender.

Make no mistake here - the pandering for the lowest common denominator is not accidental; the exploitation of a need for "democracy" is not happenstance.   Instead of demanding individuals get their focking lives together, the insidious power mongers of our democrat and repugnicon parties seek to wage war using groups to take each other out.   And while the groups are fighting, there is no one left to notice that the corrupt and america-hating leaders get elected and re-elected leaving us all wondering why it takes longer to resolve racial issues than it did to defeat tyranny in our founding.

You fools who think we are a democracy are but the koolaid drinkers thinking that pitting gay against straight and to poke the eye of Christian religion while pandering to the mooslim one (while making jokes about the Jewish one) is a recipe for success.

Listen here - as someone who is of the Libertarian bent - the only thing we have of value is of our own individual makeup - it makes nothing that you are black, I am white, you are straight, and I am gay.   It doesn't matter that you think you are a guy today and a goat yesterday.   If our society was truly predicated on the appreciation of the individual, then we'd never have to pander to the perversity of diversity.   Individualism is  the greater good - the value of you as a person to be the most perfect version of yourself is a cure for not appreciating gays and mooslims.   For if we uphold the highest ideals within ourselves and appreciate that nothing we do can change anyone else, the better off we'll be.    As long as the person next to you does not violate your rights specified in the Constitution, then you have no power and no authority to whine or complain.   And that person next to you has no power to tell you to stop sucking cock and then to make it so you cannot.    We have no right anywhere to be free from being offended; we have no right to be heard; but we have a right to say what is on our mind - even if the audience is only ourselves.

So let's stop this purging off into groups and pitting groups against groups - let's embrace each other for being individual.   And if you are a gender-speculator where you are not sure what you are - animal, vegetable, mineral, or otherwise, stop demanding that your precious group get to supplant the will of everyone else.   You are not special.   We don't even need to know of your cause.    You can keep yourself to yourself and then when you make that decision to finally decide and to commit to the painful and exhaustive changes you must undertake, then we can appreciate your uniqueness; but don't dare lecture us or demand from us respect when you don't even take the steps to make what you identify as something permanent; and don't dare lecture us that we should value you when you aren't what you appear - that you claim to be black when you are white with significant psychological issues; don't demand that the rest of us appreciate your gender-speculation process while you are a man seeking to use a women's room while our daughters are in there, under our supervision, and having to confront an adult penis in an area none should be.   And don't lecture us that you'll merely piss in a stall closed when everyone knows the difference of the sound of a man pissing and a woman pissing.

I'll always value you as a person - but don't wage war against me and my family by demanding that I respect the saga of your life and then forcing me to be a part of it.