I want to remind you of what the freshly minted King Pimple of a Man said in January 2009, “I won.... I will trump you on that.”
I am not sure where your self-righteous indignation has come from.
You lost the Presidential election.
Deal with it.
I know the feeling of having lost an election or two. We all don't get our way every time. Sometimes Republicans run shitty candidates and the left has one that has charisma. It is understandable that people would be drawn to someone who has virtually zero political experience and whose political career is measured in minutes served in office.
You all elected Barack Obama to two terms and he had months of experience as a United States Senator and whatever title he held in Illinois before that. And before that he was a community organizer blackmailing and extorting banks to give people who could not afford loans loans they would never be able to pay off. And before that he was a law professor advocating the most extreme interpretations of the Constitution you can find. There was no way he was ever mainstream in anything. He was a racist, attended a racist church for 20 years, and had his college paid for by a domestic terrorist who blew things up in the 1960's to 1970's period. And while he was President, King Pimple went outside of the law and chose what parts to enforce and which ones to ignore even if the law did forbid him to do so.
And now you have the nerve to become snowflakes when a very successful businessman with a NORMAL interpretation of the Constitution wins over someone who has never told the truth?
You have some nerve.
I want to inform you that each and every extra-Constitutional activity that you allowed King Pimple of a Man to use to evade the legislature, is now available to President Donald J. Trump. Every one of them. You didn't say jack. You didn't protest. You didn't hold him accountable. You sat there like a good snowflake and didn't demand jack.
So now you can watch King Pimple's "achievements" flushed down the shitter after Donald Trump takes a dump on them. Each and every thing that King Pimple did with a stroke of a pen can be undone with a stroke of a pen.
I don't know how you assholes on the left think that an illegal alien who crosses our border is an immigrant. That is not what they are. They are law-breakers by virtue of their first step on our soil without permission. Each second, each minute, each hour, each day, each week, and each year that they stay here is another count of illegality that is piled on.
It is illegal to hire an illegal alien. That is the law. There is an I-9 form that must be completed during the hiring process and specific documentation is required. If you do not have one piece that is required, you cannot legally be hired. So that means any business hiring an illegal alien should be prosecuted. And to make things fair, if Trump's business hired illegals, his company should be fined and those who committed the illegal actions should be fired.
Without a job, how can an illegal alien support him or herself? Think about that for a minute.
How is it that King Pimple of a Man can claim that Immigration Policy is ONLY A FEDERAL ISSUE and then have sheriffs and mayors of two bit cities and say that they are above federal law?
I have news for you - there will be no sanctuary for illegal aliens under the Trump Administration. All illegals should feel like they are being hunted - they should feel so uncomfortable that they self deport. For, if they don't, they will be force ably removed without any concern for their situation. Stealing your way here is no grounds for respect. There are legal immigrants who are going through the extensive process we have. Illegal aliens are selfish pigs who are putting themselves ahead of law-abiding immigrants. That will end. Anchor babies et al will join their Dreamers on the fast track back to the hell you chose not to improve. Your plight is not our problem. If it is so bad, rise up and shed some blood. Life sucks. Get to hell out of our country!
We have a Constitution that says much. It is not a living document that you can suddenly reinvent as you see fit. If you don't like what that document says, amend it, bitches. Get off your snowflake ass and grow a set and stop raping the document and putting out laws that force people to buy shitty healthcare insurance. If you think that marriage is what you say it is, then find integrity and stop taking a religious institution and then to steal it as a civil one. Stop combining Church and State. Invent a domestic partnership for all civil unions with adult humans and then don't arbitrarily and with bigotry just say only two adults can be joined. Stop being bigots. Hold any number of adults who want to be a union and make them legal with civil unions. And leave "marriage" to the Church people and keep it religious. Have a separate and legal union that ALL adult bondings will be held to regardless if it between two or among three or more.
Just because you can invent enough energy to claim things should be done on the Federal level does not mean that we can do it on the Federal level. The Constitution clearly delineates ONLY the few areas the Feds have power and the rest go to the states. That is how it is. We should have 50 separate states who are petri dishes for policy experiments and if you want to kill the unborn, move to a state that allows bitches to kill what is inside of them. If a state wishes to make killing an unborn child illegal, then oh focking well. That is how it should be. If a state wants to legalize pot, then they should be able to. If a state wants to make it a requirement that its citizens live nude, then that is how it should be. And if you are a gay business, you should not be forced to hire one straight person regardless of their resume. And if you are a black business, you should not have to hire one honkey. And so forth. And if you have a house or car to sell, you can sell to whom you want and there should be nothing anyone you reject can do.
We are now $20 trillion in debt. We must pay that off. We cannot feed every lazy person nor support every broodmare who can't keep her legs together. We cannot make everyone whole. We cannot afford to take care of those who can take care of themselves.
We must streamline our taxes and eliminate all personal and business exemptions and deductions. We must make it so everyone pays federal income taxes if they make a dime of money. We must not punish those who work harder just because they work more. We should make everyone equal. And if you are a male and hump women and make babies, you should be forced to pay for those broods' upkeep and not the taxpayer. You lay the seed. You do the deed. Then your life sucks. You will be bound to take care of your offspring and you just forfeited freedom.
Federal elections should have ONE voting day. No early voting ever. Everyone gets to vote under the same circumstances and let the polls run from Midnight to 11:59pm on election day. But no vote should be cast when a set of circumstances is not available to them. You should be required to produce a state issued ID and if you don't, you had a chance to get that. Ignorance of the law or proceed should not give you a provisional ballot. Either you assume responsibility to ensure you are on the voting rolls or you don't get to vote. We must ensure that we run our elections at standards equal to cashing a check. Not less. Not lower. Never.
So as you mope and whine, you can pick your ass off the ground and seek to nominate qualified candidates with character. You should never assume you've won. And white people are still the majority so you can't ignore us ever again while pandering to black lives that matter. You can no longer wage the war of the vaginas against men. You have no right to free birth control no matter how you invent into a medicine. Once you go there, you are still obligated to prevent pregnancy - either by stopping coitus until you can pay for the baby or dedicate to sucking cock which isn't even going to put pounds on you by swallowing. You are adults. You pay for your own shit. Just because you are a woman does not give you chances to pick and choose what part of your biology to leverage for equality and then to exempt you from it.
Shove it, pigs.
I hope it hurts. Use a spoon. It will hurt even more. And if you can't stand it, kill yourself.
|
Blogazine Subject Areas Pull Down Menu
Showing posts with label Democrats Campaign 2016. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Democrats Campaign 2016. Show all posts
Wednesday, November 16, 2016
Friday, October 21, 2016
During the Presidential debates of this election cycle, one thing is clear.
If you are a motivated, hard-working person, you are the enemy of Hillary Clinton.
How can I say that? Hillary said she would not raise taxes on the Middle Class or the poor and she'd give your kids free college and nothing would impact the deficit at all.
And the Middle Earth and Hobbits are real.
Bullshit!
Let us understand this very clearly - even if you seized all of the assets of the 1%, you could not pay off the national debt that we have incurred over the past 240 years. Simply raising taxes on the rich who already pay over half the federal income taxes paid by individuals even to 99% of income earned would not pay off the debt incurred by President Obama in his eight years of terror on our country.
So it is dishonest (fancy that) for Hillary to use the usual leftist shit that she'll soak the rich so that the poor and middle class can get free shit.
What Hillary and the Democrats are advocating is called "Trickle Up Economics" - by stealing the wealth of the rich and giving it to the poor, it is said that the masses will suddenly be more intelligent, prudent, and wise with their life choices and the economy would boom like we've never seen before.
The problem with this economic policy of "Trickle Up Economics" is that it doesn't exist.
Here's why.
Everyone makes life choices that may or may not be wise. There are just as many stupid rich people as there are stupid poor people - the stupid rich likely inherited their wealth and blow it - look at the likelihood of the average NFL or NBA player - they get millions in their short careers and end up filing for bankruptcy - they buy depreciating assets like cars and/or squander it on friends, drugs, booze, or sluts. What houses they buy are foreclosed on because their income is squandered so that the one smart idea they had can't be sustained. Look at those on welfare - they continue to reproduce without any concern for their ability to pay because they know they don't have to pay - you will be forced to do so. These are the same people who will spend $2500 on rims to put on a car that has a $500 loan value. These are the same people who will not forgo their urges to have the best smartphone when they can't afford the electric bill.
And suddenly we are going to think these poor asswipes are going to rise up with intelligence once they have money taken from the rich and given to them?
These are the same asswipes who whine that they are making minimum wage. These are the same asswipes who in high school dressed up in athleticware and fancied themselves the next big NBA star. So they didn't learn jack. They only know how to hump or take a peen and how to multiply in utero. These jerks have no skills, no critical thinking, can't add or subtract in their heads, and think they are owed things because they are poor.
Now it is true that there are poor people who are motivated. And these are the same poor people who usually don't accept government assistance - they do things the old fashioned way - they get off their asses, skin their knees by trying, and ultimately pull their own asses out of the gutter instead of being sent to the Democrat Plantation for Perpetual victims.
Throwing money at the poor has not done jack - we have the highest poverty rate in decades under this Administration - black poverty and unemployment is higher now than it ever was under George W. Bush.
Trickle Up Economics pre-supposes that the Government knows better than the rich how to spend their money. So instead of spending money on big ticket items, investing in businesses, hiring people, or building new expensive homes, the Government takes that money and gives it to the masses to spend on hoes, drugs, alcohol, and other vices while there is nothing gained by the economy in those one time purchases; when the rich buy a new expensive car, they pay for the salesman, the other workers, and the other business's overhead; that money then travels "down" to others. When a poor person spends $250 on a new tv, it is small potatoes; even if 10,000 deadbeats were to spend that money on a new tv, that is a one time purchase. These are not appreciating assests. These are disposable items. A smart rich person in this example would invest $250k in a new home downpayment that will generate taxes to the local authorities, have a return on the investment during the sale - creating more wealth. That $250 tv with the poor will be lucky to be worth $50 in five years - or even functional.
Making tuition free is a big mistake. Just like when you make it so people have health insurance and you pay for routine and mundane things, there will be a higher amount of demand on services - services with finite resources - and the cost will increase and the motivation to increase costs will increase. We already know that since Government has become more heavily involved in Tuition and student loan assistance, that the costs for college have skyrocketed. And since Universities are more likely than not to just raise tuition when the costs can be paid for by bilking students into taking out loans, if we make it so every schmuck can go to college tuition free, it will cause and explosion of costs. And since Universities are leftist institutions, they won't care if they raise costs - someone else will pay for it.
I became a first time voter in the 1980 election - I lived through the Jimmy Carter economy where interest rates were in double digits - where inflation was the same - and unemployment was hitting that mark as well.
Jimmy Carter was not a trickle down economic believer.
But Ronald Reagan was.
Within four years - his first term, the trend of exploding interest, unemployment, and inflation had been reversed. Putting money in the hands of those who succeed worked. And in four more years Reagan had made it an entrenched economic pattern of success. Democrats lie - that is what they do - Reagan's trickle down worked for the masses - you cannot uplift those who are lazy - they will always have their hands out and are perfectly willing to continue to do things so that they can get a hand out. We saw what happened when you raise taxes like President H.W. Bush did - a then record increase that he enacted that violated his "read my lips ... no new taxes" pledge.
In the 1990's, the economic growth under Clinton was actually no better than Bush - but in 1996 there was a world glut of oil - oil prices decreased - the economy picked up - and there was the boom in dot.coms. Nothing here was a product of a Democrat policy. It was not until Clinton was forced by Republicans to control spending and to decrease taxes that the surpluses that we are said to have produced ever happened. Read this loud and clear - had the Republicans and Gingrich not done what they had done, there would have been no budget surplus ever.
Unfortunately for America, we elected G.W. Bush - a fake conservative and a guy who wanted to look big to avenge the death threat against his father. September 11th happened and stalled all economic growth (that had already stalled in the last six months of Clinton). And then the progressive infestation started - the banks collapsed because they were forced to give loans to people who couldn't afford them because of extortion by people like private citizen lawyer Barack Obama and his ilk that claimed (wrongfully) that minorities were denied loans; what was the really happening was that loans in areas of poor home values weren't being made - and since the poor migrate to low rent areas, they lowered property values and made it worthless to offer loans to those zip codes. It was not race or ethnicity per se that was the problem, it was the geographic clustering of deadbeats and low income people. But Democrats love to invent crises (while hiding their own). And so we ended up having to loan to the people who couldn't afford them and they folded.
Bill Clinton is the clown who allowed banks to get into the cluster fuck mortgage backed securities by eliminating the Depression era law that forbid it. Republicans had nothing to do with this. And so banks do what they do - they are greedy and they hid dogshit in between a few good pieces of paper and sold these mortgage backed securities. And then when the economy was tightening up and the poor who could not afford jack started to fold, there was a cascade of failures - the dog shit which were these mortgages became worthless and then there was a cascade of greedy rich people having paper that was worthless. Then they couldn't afford things and the cascade in the latter half of 2008 happened.
Ironically one of the extortionists of banks that created this mess, Barack Obama, became President and started whining he inherited a bad economy - he didn't just drop into the office - he asked to be President - so he inherited nothing - but he exploited this to pad the federal budget baseline by one trillion and has repeatedly overspent by over $1 trillion each year (thus his $9 trillion additional debt); Hillary Clinton claimed that Obama cut the deficit by 2/3rds but he did not cut the total debt. Going from $1.1 trillion in deficits to $550 billion is not even good news - that is malfeasance!
The net here is that the Federal Government cannot spend its way into economic prosperity - stealing people's money to give to someone else is a one time transaction that will not replicate in the following years.
If you are a motivated, hard-working person, you are the enemy of Hillary Clinton.
How can I say that? Hillary said she would not raise taxes on the Middle Class or the poor and she'd give your kids free college and nothing would impact the deficit at all.
And the Middle Earth and Hobbits are real.
Bullshit!
Let us understand this very clearly - even if you seized all of the assets of the 1%, you could not pay off the national debt that we have incurred over the past 240 years. Simply raising taxes on the rich who already pay over half the federal income taxes paid by individuals even to 99% of income earned would not pay off the debt incurred by President Obama in his eight years of terror on our country.
So it is dishonest (fancy that) for Hillary to use the usual leftist shit that she'll soak the rich so that the poor and middle class can get free shit.
What Hillary and the Democrats are advocating is called "Trickle Up Economics" - by stealing the wealth of the rich and giving it to the poor, it is said that the masses will suddenly be more intelligent, prudent, and wise with their life choices and the economy would boom like we've never seen before.
The problem with this economic policy of "Trickle Up Economics" is that it doesn't exist.
Here's why.
Everyone makes life choices that may or may not be wise. There are just as many stupid rich people as there are stupid poor people - the stupid rich likely inherited their wealth and blow it - look at the likelihood of the average NFL or NBA player - they get millions in their short careers and end up filing for bankruptcy - they buy depreciating assets like cars and/or squander it on friends, drugs, booze, or sluts. What houses they buy are foreclosed on because their income is squandered so that the one smart idea they had can't be sustained. Look at those on welfare - they continue to reproduce without any concern for their ability to pay because they know they don't have to pay - you will be forced to do so. These are the same people who will spend $2500 on rims to put on a car that has a $500 loan value. These are the same people who will not forgo their urges to have the best smartphone when they can't afford the electric bill.
And suddenly we are going to think these poor asswipes are going to rise up with intelligence once they have money taken from the rich and given to them?
These are the same asswipes who whine that they are making minimum wage. These are the same asswipes who in high school dressed up in athleticware and fancied themselves the next big NBA star. So they didn't learn jack. They only know how to hump or take a peen and how to multiply in utero. These jerks have no skills, no critical thinking, can't add or subtract in their heads, and think they are owed things because they are poor.
Now it is true that there are poor people who are motivated. And these are the same poor people who usually don't accept government assistance - they do things the old fashioned way - they get off their asses, skin their knees by trying, and ultimately pull their own asses out of the gutter instead of being sent to the Democrat Plantation for Perpetual victims.
Throwing money at the poor has not done jack - we have the highest poverty rate in decades under this Administration - black poverty and unemployment is higher now than it ever was under George W. Bush.
Trickle Up Economics pre-supposes that the Government knows better than the rich how to spend their money. So instead of spending money on big ticket items, investing in businesses, hiring people, or building new expensive homes, the Government takes that money and gives it to the masses to spend on hoes, drugs, alcohol, and other vices while there is nothing gained by the economy in those one time purchases; when the rich buy a new expensive car, they pay for the salesman, the other workers, and the other business's overhead; that money then travels "down" to others. When a poor person spends $250 on a new tv, it is small potatoes; even if 10,000 deadbeats were to spend that money on a new tv, that is a one time purchase. These are not appreciating assests. These are disposable items. A smart rich person in this example would invest $250k in a new home downpayment that will generate taxes to the local authorities, have a return on the investment during the sale - creating more wealth. That $250 tv with the poor will be lucky to be worth $50 in five years - or even functional.
Making tuition free is a big mistake. Just like when you make it so people have health insurance and you pay for routine and mundane things, there will be a higher amount of demand on services - services with finite resources - and the cost will increase and the motivation to increase costs will increase. We already know that since Government has become more heavily involved in Tuition and student loan assistance, that the costs for college have skyrocketed. And since Universities are more likely than not to just raise tuition when the costs can be paid for by bilking students into taking out loans, if we make it so every schmuck can go to college tuition free, it will cause and explosion of costs. And since Universities are leftist institutions, they won't care if they raise costs - someone else will pay for it.
I became a first time voter in the 1980 election - I lived through the Jimmy Carter economy where interest rates were in double digits - where inflation was the same - and unemployment was hitting that mark as well.
Jimmy Carter was not a trickle down economic believer.
But Ronald Reagan was.
Within four years - his first term, the trend of exploding interest, unemployment, and inflation had been reversed. Putting money in the hands of those who succeed worked. And in four more years Reagan had made it an entrenched economic pattern of success. Democrats lie - that is what they do - Reagan's trickle down worked for the masses - you cannot uplift those who are lazy - they will always have their hands out and are perfectly willing to continue to do things so that they can get a hand out. We saw what happened when you raise taxes like President H.W. Bush did - a then record increase that he enacted that violated his "read my lips ... no new taxes" pledge.
In the 1990's, the economic growth under Clinton was actually no better than Bush - but in 1996 there was a world glut of oil - oil prices decreased - the economy picked up - and there was the boom in dot.coms. Nothing here was a product of a Democrat policy. It was not until Clinton was forced by Republicans to control spending and to decrease taxes that the surpluses that we are said to have produced ever happened. Read this loud and clear - had the Republicans and Gingrich not done what they had done, there would have been no budget surplus ever.
Unfortunately for America, we elected G.W. Bush - a fake conservative and a guy who wanted to look big to avenge the death threat against his father. September 11th happened and stalled all economic growth (that had already stalled in the last six months of Clinton). And then the progressive infestation started - the banks collapsed because they were forced to give loans to people who couldn't afford them because of extortion by people like private citizen lawyer Barack Obama and his ilk that claimed (wrongfully) that minorities were denied loans; what was the really happening was that loans in areas of poor home values weren't being made - and since the poor migrate to low rent areas, they lowered property values and made it worthless to offer loans to those zip codes. It was not race or ethnicity per se that was the problem, it was the geographic clustering of deadbeats and low income people. But Democrats love to invent crises (while hiding their own). And so we ended up having to loan to the people who couldn't afford them and they folded.
Bill Clinton is the clown who allowed banks to get into the cluster fuck mortgage backed securities by eliminating the Depression era law that forbid it. Republicans had nothing to do with this. And so banks do what they do - they are greedy and they hid dogshit in between a few good pieces of paper and sold these mortgage backed securities. And then when the economy was tightening up and the poor who could not afford jack started to fold, there was a cascade of failures - the dog shit which were these mortgages became worthless and then there was a cascade of greedy rich people having paper that was worthless. Then they couldn't afford things and the cascade in the latter half of 2008 happened.
Ironically one of the extortionists of banks that created this mess, Barack Obama, became President and started whining he inherited a bad economy - he didn't just drop into the office - he asked to be President - so he inherited nothing - but he exploited this to pad the federal budget baseline by one trillion and has repeatedly overspent by over $1 trillion each year (thus his $9 trillion additional debt); Hillary Clinton claimed that Obama cut the deficit by 2/3rds but he did not cut the total debt. Going from $1.1 trillion in deficits to $550 billion is not even good news - that is malfeasance!
The net here is that the Federal Government cannot spend its way into economic prosperity - stealing people's money to give to someone else is a one time transaction that will not replicate in the following years.
Wednesday, October 19, 2016
I realize that many leftists are not well educated. Considering that the government school system, a product of leftist infiltration and propaganda for the last fifty years, has slowly and methodically reduced America's children to skulls full of mush, over-inflated senses of self-worth, and a profound lack of any idea of history (unless it is pervert studies based on gender, ethnicity, and sexual orientation, and the latest gender speculation).
Face it, our children are as lacking in critical thinking and the ability to do research to find answers on their own without some leftist pig teach or professor telling them dishonest things and passing them off as facts.
It is with this light that I shed a profound and troubling rise of leftist-state-sponsored-propaganda that is now being passed off as the television and social media - the alphabet networks and social networking sites.
With the wikileaks releases (we are on round 12) leaking Hillary's campaign documents, her campaign managers tens of thousands of emails, and the Democrap National Committee servers, we now know as fact that there is no impartial news media in the United States.
None.
Fox News and the bulk of talk radio is controlled by the right - but not controlled by the Republican party.
Every other network and every social media website and service is one with the Democrat party - there is no separation between the party and media.
This presents a problem.
It is in violation of the "Journalist's Creed" - something that people who graduate from journalism schools are made to uphold in theory and in practice; as the Hippocratic oath binds the doctor to "do no harm", the Journalist's creed obligates the journalist to:
I believe in the profession of journalism.
I believe that the public journal is a public trust; that all connected with it are, to the full measure of their responsibility, trustees for the public; that acceptance of a lesser service than the public service is betrayal of this trust.
I believe that clear thinking and clear statement, accuracy and fairness are fundamental to good journalism.
I believe that a journalist should write only what he holds in his heart to be true.
I believe that suppression of the news, for any consideration other than the welfare of society, is indefensible.
I believe that no one should write as a journalist what he would not say as a gentleman; that bribery by one’s own pocketbook is as much to be avoided as bribery by the pocketbook of another; that individual responsibility may not be escaped by pleading another’s instructions or another’s dividends.
I believe that advertising, news and editorial columns should alike serve the best interests of readers; that a single standard of helpful truth and cleanness should prevail for all; that the supreme test of good journalism is the measure of its public service.
I believe that the journalism which succeeds best — and best deserves success — fears God and honors Man; is stoutly independent, unmoved by pride of opinion or greed of power, constructive, tolerant but never careless, self-controlled, patient, always respectful of its readers but always unafraid, is quickly indignant at injustice; is unswayed by the appeal of privilege or the clamor of the mob; seeks to give every man a chance and, as far as law and honest wage and recognition of human brotherhood can make it so, an equal chance; is profoundly patriotic while sincerely promoting international good will and cementing world-comradeship; is a journalism of humanity, of and for today’s world.
It is quite possible in this new world of corruption, in the post JFK world of American politics, that schools of journalism no longer team the Journalist's Creed. I say this because in today's America, we are not told the truth - there is no obligation for our media, news, and social, to point out what conflicts with the beliefs of our leftist media who contribute millions of dollars to the Democrat party and who have sold their souls to that without any sense of fairness or honesty.
As a Libertarian, I loathe those who are liars. I see the Democrat party and its followers and voters as the greatest threat to our individual liberty and the security of this nation. You see, the overt actions of the left are anti-thetical to our Constitution - leftists by their practice defile the document by seizing power for the Federal Government that was never granted to that entity. While it is almost a nirvana to talk about the Constitution, the left knows that a free people, a collection of fifty distinct and viable states is a threat to their power. The founding document does skew the power balance to the states as an intentional field of 50 gardens - 50 petri dishes - where ideas are tried and sometimes fail - where people are free to choose to live in the form of government and ideals of their choosing, but they have no right to demand that the Federal Government to transform a state into one like another; for it is the obligation of that state's people to choose what they want and how they want it; it is not up to leftists in Congress or at the Presidential level to sweep from states that which the people have chosen as their purpose and way of life.
I have long held here that the left is the greatest threat to true liberty and individual rights since these miscreants want to transfer to groups of people and to remove from us and individuals. The recent uprising by blacks, fueled by George Soro's money and through the continued exploitation of blacks for political power for the Democrats seeks to make whites to pay for fictional crimes against blacks - and yes, there are fictional crimes that have no basis in fact - the police are no more likely to kill a black person than a white one - that black on black crime is swept under the rug - and that failures of blacks to overcome their now-accepted-social roles of impregnating multiple women, sitting back waiting for someone to promote them without doing the work, or for choosing the wrong professions because that would make them "too white".
We know now that Google and Facebook are in bed with the Democrats - and promoting Hillary while doing all they can to damage Trump. This is simply a fact if you have read the released emails over the past two weeks. We know that ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, and CNBC are up to their hairlines in advancing the Hillary cause at the expense of fabricating items on Trump. It is so bad now that you'd be hard pressed to know the depth of Hillary's frail health, her participation in the war on Bill's women, and that her participation in the State Department was to enrich the Clinton family - and to give Chessie Clinton jobs she never was qualified for. And we know now that Hillary's speeches to Wall Street were two-faced - not in quoting Lincoln, but in actual practice - telling the big wigs on Wall Street one thing while she was saying the direct opposite to the public.
There is one cure to bring back a free estate of journalism: public hangings of all who violated their creed and who advanced the most dishonest candidate to ever run for office and to hide her flaws.
To cure this situation, we must enact sweeping journalism disclosure information that is to appear on anything that is proported to be a news item; editorials and commentaries will need to be labeled as "opinion pieces" and are not subject to tough disclosure.
The following are my proposed disclosure laws for news content reporting on politics:
Face it, our children are as lacking in critical thinking and the ability to do research to find answers on their own without some leftist pig teach or professor telling them dishonest things and passing them off as facts.
It is with this light that I shed a profound and troubling rise of leftist-state-sponsored-propaganda that is now being passed off as the television and social media - the alphabet networks and social networking sites.
With the wikileaks releases (we are on round 12) leaking Hillary's campaign documents, her campaign managers tens of thousands of emails, and the Democrap National Committee servers, we now know as fact that there is no impartial news media in the United States.
None.
Fox News and the bulk of talk radio is controlled by the right - but not controlled by the Republican party.
Every other network and every social media website and service is one with the Democrat party - there is no separation between the party and media.
This presents a problem.
It is in violation of the "Journalist's Creed" - something that people who graduate from journalism schools are made to uphold in theory and in practice; as the Hippocratic oath binds the doctor to "do no harm", the Journalist's creed obligates the journalist to:
I believe in the profession of journalism.
I believe that the public journal is a public trust; that all connected with it are, to the full measure of their responsibility, trustees for the public; that acceptance of a lesser service than the public service is betrayal of this trust.
I believe that clear thinking and clear statement, accuracy and fairness are fundamental to good journalism.
I believe that a journalist should write only what he holds in his heart to be true.
I believe that suppression of the news, for any consideration other than the welfare of society, is indefensible.
I believe that no one should write as a journalist what he would not say as a gentleman; that bribery by one’s own pocketbook is as much to be avoided as bribery by the pocketbook of another; that individual responsibility may not be escaped by pleading another’s instructions or another’s dividends.
I believe that advertising, news and editorial columns should alike serve the best interests of readers; that a single standard of helpful truth and cleanness should prevail for all; that the supreme test of good journalism is the measure of its public service.
I believe that the journalism which succeeds best — and best deserves success — fears God and honors Man; is stoutly independent, unmoved by pride of opinion or greed of power, constructive, tolerant but never careless, self-controlled, patient, always respectful of its readers but always unafraid, is quickly indignant at injustice; is unswayed by the appeal of privilege or the clamor of the mob; seeks to give every man a chance and, as far as law and honest wage and recognition of human brotherhood can make it so, an equal chance; is profoundly patriotic while sincerely promoting international good will and cementing world-comradeship; is a journalism of humanity, of and for today’s world.
It is quite possible in this new world of corruption, in the post JFK world of American politics, that schools of journalism no longer team the Journalist's Creed. I say this because in today's America, we are not told the truth - there is no obligation for our media, news, and social, to point out what conflicts with the beliefs of our leftist media who contribute millions of dollars to the Democrat party and who have sold their souls to that without any sense of fairness or honesty.
As a Libertarian, I loathe those who are liars. I see the Democrat party and its followers and voters as the greatest threat to our individual liberty and the security of this nation. You see, the overt actions of the left are anti-thetical to our Constitution - leftists by their practice defile the document by seizing power for the Federal Government that was never granted to that entity. While it is almost a nirvana to talk about the Constitution, the left knows that a free people, a collection of fifty distinct and viable states is a threat to their power. The founding document does skew the power balance to the states as an intentional field of 50 gardens - 50 petri dishes - where ideas are tried and sometimes fail - where people are free to choose to live in the form of government and ideals of their choosing, but they have no right to demand that the Federal Government to transform a state into one like another; for it is the obligation of that state's people to choose what they want and how they want it; it is not up to leftists in Congress or at the Presidential level to sweep from states that which the people have chosen as their purpose and way of life.
I have long held here that the left is the greatest threat to true liberty and individual rights since these miscreants want to transfer to groups of people and to remove from us and individuals. The recent uprising by blacks, fueled by George Soro's money and through the continued exploitation of blacks for political power for the Democrats seeks to make whites to pay for fictional crimes against blacks - and yes, there are fictional crimes that have no basis in fact - the police are no more likely to kill a black person than a white one - that black on black crime is swept under the rug - and that failures of blacks to overcome their now-accepted-social roles of impregnating multiple women, sitting back waiting for someone to promote them without doing the work, or for choosing the wrong professions because that would make them "too white".
We know now that Google and Facebook are in bed with the Democrats - and promoting Hillary while doing all they can to damage Trump. This is simply a fact if you have read the released emails over the past two weeks. We know that ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, and CNBC are up to their hairlines in advancing the Hillary cause at the expense of fabricating items on Trump. It is so bad now that you'd be hard pressed to know the depth of Hillary's frail health, her participation in the war on Bill's women, and that her participation in the State Department was to enrich the Clinton family - and to give Chessie Clinton jobs she never was qualified for. And we know now that Hillary's speeches to Wall Street were two-faced - not in quoting Lincoln, but in actual practice - telling the big wigs on Wall Street one thing while she was saying the direct opposite to the public.
There is one cure to bring back a free estate of journalism: public hangings of all who violated their creed and who advanced the most dishonest candidate to ever run for office and to hide her flaws.
To cure this situation, we must enact sweeping journalism disclosure information that is to appear on anything that is proported to be a news item; editorials and commentaries will need to be labeled as "opinion pieces" and are not subject to tough disclosure.
The following are my proposed disclosure laws for news content reporting on politics:
- Every journalist will be required to file a form every December 31st that discloses all campaign contributions they have made in that calendar year at all levels of campaigns;
- Every contribution that they have made to political organizations or causes that advance national agenda like climate change, women's, gay, gender-speculation, illegal immigration, or other such groups which advocate for a change at the national level;
- No such disclosures will be made from point two to state and local races unless any of the national groups lobby in state legislation and then the journalist will be required to file all contributions to those agencies.
- All voting life time voting records for all journalists on the national and state level (not local) shall be required to be accessible through a link on a website at the place of the journalists' employment - readily available for anyone to view with ease.
- Violations of these provisions shall result in fines not to less than $100k for each count and no less than 10 years in jail for each count.
- Violations that exceed five in a lifetime of the journalist shall revoke their ability to be hired as a journalist; they will be fully able to act as a commentator since that is the job they've proved that they are truly doing.
- It shall be unlawful at the highest level for any journalist to report on a candidate in which they have given campaign contributions during that election cycle. Past elections will not have an impact, but contributing to a current candidate is proof of hypocrasy and a conflict of interest. Having violated this provision, the journalist will be barred for life being employed as a journalist and will be forced to forever disclose they are a commentator and that they are not reporting the news. If someone is caught having reported the news without disclosing they are banned from doing so, and without disclosing they are a commentator, then they shall be hanged in public.
- Blogs, newsletters, and websites that report news articles and comment on them shall not be bound to any standard as long as their blog et al discloses that they are opinion sites, not doing journalism, and have no point of generating the new story.
- All polls and polling companies will be forced to disclose any contact with campaigns and all of those responsible for the generation of the poll results shall be compelled to report their lifetime voting record and any contributions made during their lifetimes and that they shall also be barred from making any campaign contributions in a current election cycle.
- Flagrant violations of these terms shall result in execution by public hanging.
Friday, September 30, 2016
Wednesday, September 7, 2016
Sunday, August 14, 2016
Thursday, August 11, 2016
Sunday, August 7, 2016
I wasn't born yesterday.
I didn't fall off a turnip truck.
And I was not dropped on my head at birth.
To suggest that the Democrat National Committee computer hacks that ended up bringing down their chairperson, Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz, or that the hacks on the Clinton Campaign computers were also tied to Russia is really a laughable proposition.
You see, there is someone who has REAL MOTIVE to bring down Hillary and it is not a set of Russian Hackers.
It is our own National Security Agency (NSA).
Their motive - Hillary is a National Security Risk so vast and so real that lives are dependent on her NEVER becoming President.
The lamestream news media is filled with people who claim to be journalists but who never spend an ounce of real journalistic effort to report on the truth. And with the lamestream media having sold out to advance the Clinton narrative, there is precious reason to invent news to mask the truth. We have to look no further than how the news media is hiding details about Clinton's email scandal and not reporting how she is consistently lying about it.
During the last week, instead of reporting on Hillary's serial dishonesty, they are covering her covering up her dishonesty by spinning her four hundredth version of the scandal by saying she was "short circuited" in her ability to comprehend the breadth and scope of her personal server.
This is a person you think is fit to become President?
She can't understand National Security ramifications of her own decisions?
Yet, the news media has hidden from you significant points about "Russian Hackers" that should cause you to pause.
Almost all Hackers use Russian Hacking tools.
They're the gold standard of hacking devices.
Just because the tool used or the server(s) used to launch an attack are Russian, that does not mean that the Russian Government launched, knew of, or initiated the attack. Anyone who knows anything about hacking (I had to research this story) knows that Russia is a great place from which to launch attacks and you don't need to be Russian to use the servers - these aren't KGB servers, but they are nonetheless Russian in origin but privately owned and used to launch wholescale criminal attacks all over the globe. This is not to say that there isn't state-sponsored hacking from Russia, but it is not like in China where everything is state sponsored (and state denied). There are two distinct hacking types and it can be almost guaranteed that state sponsored Russian hacks would not use Russian language fingerprints in their attacks.
But the attacks on the Democrat National Committee and the Clinton Campaign did have Russian Language fingerprints and this made is so preciously easy for the pro-Democrat lamestream media to jump to and to launch a false narrative that the Russian Government hacked their campaigns and to then leap to spinning it is a friend of Donald Trump since Putin once said something nice about Donald Trump.
Who has REAL MOTIVE to go after Hillary Clinton?
The United States National Security apparatus has a significant reason to go after Hillary Clinton and has access and ability to use Russian Language hacks that would throw off suspicion and to make an American attack seem like a Russian-based one to throw off the scent.
Hillary Clinton is a National Security threat so pervasive that she makes Mr. Snowden's leaks seem like child's play in comparison.
With a woman so unskilled, so lacking in commonsense and so hellbent on destroying the America we love, Hillary Clinton is an uncontrollable, lying, duplicitous security risk that she could unintentionally put people's lives at risk yet kill hundreds of our operatives overseas through her cavalier attitude and her self importance perspective that she is above all laws.
Having found out that Russian-based and Russian Language fingerprinted coding is not simply an indicator of Russian state sponsored hacking, I then stumbled upon a second article that has now given credence to the National Security Agency of the United States as being the likely culprits in hacking and sending the information to Wikileaks.
Here is the best explanation that I've seen that would give credence to Hillary being pursued by the NSA because of her risks to National Security.
Russia really has no reason to destroy Hillary. She's a gold mind of intelligence gaffes and they would want her elected so they could continue to get her leaks and gaffes and misjudgments. Trump would pose a greater risk to Russia on all levels even if Trump seems friendly on the surface, Trump understands the need to keep enemies close on the surface but to stab them when needed. Hillary talks a talk but is a weakling on security because she puts herself above everything and laws mean jack to her.
Interesting possible linkage to Hillary's private server that proves she was hacked, that she is a National Security Risk, and is a liar (she said her server was never attacked). Read here.
MEET AMERICA'S LEAST QUALIFIED PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE EVER!
Friday, August 5, 2016
"But Comey made no such blanket assessment."
LYING CUNT SHIFTS POSITIONS CONSTANTLY
The Tribune continues, "Clinton's comments about her email use have shifted over time. When she first acknowledged the use of private emails in March 2015, Clinton said: "I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email. There is no classified material.""
"She later shifted her explanation to say she never sent or received "any emails marked classified at the time.""
"Comey debunked that assertion in July. He said FBI investigators found that 113 emails from Clinton's server contained classified information that had been secret at the time it was sent or received. Many more emails contained sensitive information but were marked classified only later.
On "Fox News Sunday," Clinton said, "Director Comey said my answers were truthful and what I've said is consistent with what I have told the American people." This, despite Comey's earlier statement to Congress that her public statement about classified material was "not true.""
In short, the lying bitch Hillary is lying and lying about lies she told and lying about the lies she is now telling.
The Chicago Tribune further shreds Hillary as they note below:
On Friday, Clinton said she wanted to clarify her recent remarks and acknowledged she had "short-circuited" what she intended to say. But her intended clarification was yet another short circuit of the public record.
CLINTON: "I have said during the interview and in many other occasions over the past months that what I told the FBI, which he said was truthful, is consistent with what I have said publicly."
THE FACTS: Comey has declined to say precisely what Clinton told FBI investigators, but he has never publicly called Clinton's comments truthful. He said only that "we have no basis to conclude that she lied to the FBI" — a legally calibrated statement that explained only that investigators did not find any evidence that she was lying to them.
When Comey was asked during a House hearing the same month about whether Clinton lied to the public, Comey begged off, saying: "That's a question I'm not qualified to answer. I can speak only about what she said to the FBI."
___
CLINTON: "And so what we have here is pretty much what I have been saying throughout this whole year and that is that I never sent or received anything that was marked classified."
THE FACTS: At the July House hearing, Comey was asked about Clinton's public statements that there was "nothing marked classified" in the private emails she sent or received. Comey replied, "That's not true," and added, "there was classified material emailed."
Wednesday, August 3, 2016
I know Democrats.
Hillary Clinton lied to the parents of the Benghazi terrorist attack on our compound. Now she wants to drag out two parents to use as a prop against Donald Trump. She will stoop to no low because hell is where this cunt was born and she'll drag us all down there so she has company in her eternal dirt nap at the Hotel Hades.
But I digress - Democrats are inherently treacherous people with motivations well beyond trying to pander to a sob story of a dead mooslim son and grieving parents.
Just like the Sandy Hook parents are not too proud to parade around the virtual corpses of their dead children to ban guns for everyone, the Hahn parents are not as pure as they were painted to be. Whether or not the mother is a silent partner in the preservation of the family income stream or truly is a dozen year blubber bag, we will never know.
But we do know that her husband is one dirty mother focker who has the maintenance of his income stream as motive to bash Donald Trump. What is sickening is that this mooslim dirtbag is using his son's corpse for profit.
The media has given this asshole far too much time while giving FIFTY times less coverage to the parents of people killed by illegal aliens.
So, let's cut to the chase - Khan is a wealthy immigration lawyer who profits from mooslim immigration to the United States - a policy clearly advocated by Hillary Clinton.
And... Khan's income would dry up under Donald Trump who would shut down the importation of assorted Mooslims - dirtbags and all.
What is interesting is that when the news broke today that this blubbering Gold Star father was a wealthy Immigration lawyer specializing in the importation of Mooslims, he shut his website down!
But wait ... there is more dirt and it ties this piece of shit Khan to Saudis and indirectly to the Clinton Foundation.
"Khan, according to Intelius as also reported by Walid Shoebat,
used to work at the law firm Hogan Lovells, LLP, a major D.C. law firm
that has been on retainer as the law firm representing the government of
Saudi Arabia in the United States for years. Citing federal government
disclosure forms, the Washington Free Beacon reported the connection
between Saudi Arabia and Hogan Lovells a couple weeks ago."
“Hogan Lovells LLP, another U.S. firm
hired by the Saudis, is registered to work for the Royal Embassy of
Saudi Arabia through 2016, disclosures show,” Joe Schoffstall of the
Free Beacon reported."
"The federal form filed with the Department of Justice
is a requirement under the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938,
which makes lobbyists and lawyers working on behalf of foreign
governments and other agents from abroad with interests in the United
States register with the federal government."
"The government of Saudi Arabia, of course, has donated heavily to the Clinton Foundation.
“The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has given
between $10 and $25 million to the foundation while Friends of Saudi
Arabia has contributed between $1 and $5 million,” Schoffstall wrote."
Monday, August 1, 2016
The Democrats have seized upon a problem that might earn them votes based on bribery of the stupid young who are saddled with huge college loans and little hope of employment in the Obama economy.
But college debt is not a federal problem - it fails to pass the test of a power delegated by the Constitution and just because the feds can do it, that doesn't give them the authority to do anything about it.
The real issue here is that our children are so filled with self importance and entitlement that they have not sat down to plan their careers and to focus on courses of study that will more likely get them jobs. Our wandering skulls full of mush are going to school based upon the nirvana of four years of parties, promiscuous sex, and carefree life experience and have not given any thought to how they are going to pay for their $80k orgy of nothing.
Yes, the Feds are partially responsible for the student loans because the Feds ventured into an area that they have no authority to be in - taking over issuing student loans. The Feds must immediately stop being in this and assuming any of the debt of students. We need to push this back to the states and to allow private institutions to issue debt (and maybe they'll start requiring courses of study that have employment potential instead of focusing on Lesbo and Gender Speculating Rights).
The insertion of the Feds into student loans has allowed higher education (or the Leninist institutions that call themselves that) to inflate educational costs at a faster rate than inflation. The Feds have actually caused the increase in education costs because nearly anyone with a pulse can get loans and there is no pressure on Universities to hold down the costs; rather the Universities are inflating professor salaries, building worthless new buildings, and expanding college sports (and being required to have women's sports whom no one ever watches except the dyke basketball series).
It is time to starve the Universities and force them to the fat farm. Dry up loan money and make it tougher to get a student loan. As the shortage of students hits the schools of advanced leftist swine studies, their worthless programs will dry up and worthless professors will be forced to run french fry stations at McDonald's because they aren't capable of doing anything else.
As students are now forced by REALITY into studies that produce assets for the economy, we'll have incredible competition to have higher educational output and students will be better prepared to earn high paying salaries. And since not every student should go to college (and there is no right to a college education), we will have better students competing for grades and the low ability students will go to trade schools where they belong and they can become plumbers and electricians which pay well and are in high demand. Nothing wrong with being an HVAC tech that earns over $20 per hour!
So let's dismiss the Democrat appeal to students and call it what it is - bribery for votes.
But college debt is not a federal problem - it fails to pass the test of a power delegated by the Constitution and just because the feds can do it, that doesn't give them the authority to do anything about it.
The real issue here is that our children are so filled with self importance and entitlement that they have not sat down to plan their careers and to focus on courses of study that will more likely get them jobs. Our wandering skulls full of mush are going to school based upon the nirvana of four years of parties, promiscuous sex, and carefree life experience and have not given any thought to how they are going to pay for their $80k orgy of nothing.
Yes, the Feds are partially responsible for the student loans because the Feds ventured into an area that they have no authority to be in - taking over issuing student loans. The Feds must immediately stop being in this and assuming any of the debt of students. We need to push this back to the states and to allow private institutions to issue debt (and maybe they'll start requiring courses of study that have employment potential instead of focusing on Lesbo and Gender Speculating Rights).
The insertion of the Feds into student loans has allowed higher education (or the Leninist institutions that call themselves that) to inflate educational costs at a faster rate than inflation. The Feds have actually caused the increase in education costs because nearly anyone with a pulse can get loans and there is no pressure on Universities to hold down the costs; rather the Universities are inflating professor salaries, building worthless new buildings, and expanding college sports (and being required to have women's sports whom no one ever watches except the dyke basketball series).
It is time to starve the Universities and force them to the fat farm. Dry up loan money and make it tougher to get a student loan. As the shortage of students hits the schools of advanced leftist swine studies, their worthless programs will dry up and worthless professors will be forced to run french fry stations at McDonald's because they aren't capable of doing anything else.
As students are now forced by REALITY into studies that produce assets for the economy, we'll have incredible competition to have higher educational output and students will be better prepared to earn high paying salaries. And since not every student should go to college (and there is no right to a college education), we will have better students competing for grades and the low ability students will go to trade schools where they belong and they can become plumbers and electricians which pay well and are in high demand. Nothing wrong with being an HVAC tech that earns over $20 per hour!
So let's dismiss the Democrat appeal to students and call it what it is - bribery for votes.
Friday, July 29, 2016
Hillary Clinton should be applauded that she got through that entire speech without hacking her lungs up as she is known to do and without laughing hysterically as the assembled schmucks ate this shit up.
The reality of Hillary's speech is that this was all smoke and mirrors - promises and promises - and none of it grasped the real world we face where Radical Islamic terrorism has gained a new foothold in our world thanks to incompetence of Hillary Clinton and King Pimple of a Man.
It is so utterly easy to reduce concepts to all love and warmth - turning illegal aliens and their lawlessness into compassion for those who come here. It is as if we should all bake cookies and have cold milk ready when thieves appear in our homes wanting what we have and we should just be so blessed that they chose us to rob. You know, those people have less than us, and it is so wrong for us to demand that they obey our locked doors and windows and the concept of trespassing.
Illegal aliens are not our friends - they are not here legally - they have no right to be here - they steal jobs Americans could work if there wasn't welfare and they do bring diseases and there are awful people here like rapists, child molesters, and drunk drivers, and otherwise human pieces of shit that enter this country along with the unfortunate. But here is the rub, America is not the toilet bowl for the world anymore - we don't have to take the shit that comes here without deciding to get the best available. It is not just and it is not right to pander to a bunch of lazy malcontents who are too lazy to fight for their own freedom and rights in their country and then to have these jackasses to come here and to get a welcome mat while our poor are pissed on and ignored.
I still don't understand how in 2016 women have any right to think they are special. Of course the usual appeal to the owners of stank vaginas comes across loud and clear - reproductive rights are all about being able to kill and unborn child without due process - but a woman butchering a child to cover up her lack of responsibility during the pre-penetrative act and during it is lost upon Progressives since abortion is one of their holy grails.
Of course Hillary would say she isn't after the second amendment, but that is not what is said behind closed doors to her donors. This cunt has wood for stealing our guns and making us less safe. She has to say she is all about protecting us from being killed by guns, but in her heart, she wants to shred the second amendment faster than she can spread Huma's legs and eat some nasty snatch.
In all her blather about LGB rights (I don't respect Gender Speculators), she never once mentioned the gay people in the land of Islam who are routinely killed. You'd think that someone who risked so much to lecture the Chinese about Women's Rights would have the gonads to lecture the Islamists about respecting those who crave peen and own one too. It is not surprising that Cunt Clinton would not mention gays outside of this country because there is no hope of them voting in 2016 for her. As far as her grasp of reality goes, the only queers that count are the idiots who give her three dollar bill contributions and dress up to vote on election day for her.
Of course Hillary had to appeal to the Obama voters - the misguided brain stem thinkers who believe that America is better off today than it was eight years ago even as homeownership has now dipped below 1965 levels when LBJ was President. We have near record high labor non-participation rates but you'd never know this since she was licking Obama's scrotum and singing his high praises even as eight years ago she invented the Birther Movement claiming that King Pimple was really some low rent Kenyan bushwacker.
And you just knew that Hillary would go all black lives matter and appeal to the inner racism that still clings to the perpetual victimhood of black america as if it is their birth rite.
Hillary made some mad attempts to pander to the faux Democrat who nearly stole the show - Old Krazy Bernard and his wife were sitting there looking less than enthusiastic as Hillary hijacked his ideas. I can just imagine him thinking that old crow means none of this shit and I couldn't defeat her when I had the chance!
Of course there was the continuation of the Clinton family saga - the meeting in the library where a future lesbian falls for a peen that is slight in stature and big on dispensing Arkansas baby batter onto dark blue dresses. Of course there was no mention of her husband's serial rapes and how he treated women nor was there any mention of Vince Foster and mysterious plane deaths of others.
I'm so sick of this notion that there is a glass ceiling for owners of vaginas. Considering how they play fast and loose with maternity leave and get to get knocked up without any job consequence while men endure the drudgery of work, vagina owners have it easy - and now they want to get credit for time knocked up as if it is real work experience and they want to be paid the same amount as a man who has worked that year the woman was sitting on her ass watching tv while someone else watched their child.
I am not sure where this notion came from where you have a right to affordable anything - childcare, healthcare, a living wage for working a job that you have failed to prepare for something better. And of course Hillary jumped on the free college shit and excusing your education debt because you were too lazy to go to class and earn a real degree or that you picked some worthless course of study like women's or gay studies which only means you are brainwashed with liberal concepts that don't bear anything to reality.
What we had here my friends was a Trojan horse - first carved out a pile of fresh stinking dog shit and then covered with a nice light colored butter cream icing. This was a dog and pony show unlike any other - with a frigid old white woman and her running mate, a negative IQ Court Jester who speaks in a spanish tonguelingus. Here we have some rich white woman who makes millions of dollars speaking to Wall Street and we are going to take her seriously that she's Maggie Thatcher who will take on Argentina and win?
If you believed what she said tonight then you deserve the taste of shit you'll have in November as she defiles the Constitution and takes her dishonesty and deception act that she perfected at the State Department to the Oval Office where she'll collect millions of FBI files on you and your neighbors and she'll be whoring out the Oval Office for billions for her family wealth and to keep Chelsea happy popping out more babies from the dumbest man in the world who thinks she is hot in bed.
Party on, fools. The iced dog stool is there for you to consume. And don't dare come back at me when your ox is gored and America is pushed into the shitter faster by a white woman than by a black racist from Kenya.
Thursday, July 28, 2016
America has been defiled by the nomination of Hillary Rodhambone Clinton as the Democrat Candidate for President of the United States.
Democrats have nominated the most dishonest, deceptive, law breaking person ever to run for President.
Just remember, the only reason this matters tonight is that she has a vagina - an old, dried up yeasty muffin that would make you vomit if you knew her personally.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)