I will admit.   I loathe the religion of Islam and all that practice it.

My contempt is based on how lazy and spineless so-called moderate mooslims truly are.    While these spineless rat bastards tell us (and lecture us) that Islam is a religion of peace, it is far from that in actual practice.    The moderates who would like to make us believe that Ice Piss and Al Qaeda are fringe groups; yet these moderates do nothing to push back those fringe groups and to seize Islam for peace.    Those who fail to risk their lives to go after their fringe are really enablers of militancy.   

As a gay man, I have no compassion for those who hide in the shadows because they fear they'll be beheaded by their own mooslim brethern.    Oh, boo hoo.   Your spineless actions have sentenced gay men and women to death by stoning - death by being pushed off buildings and when those people cling to life, you pick up stones and throw them from your tinted glass windowed homes.    Silence is complicity in my opinion and you are a murderer through silence - complicit in the deaths of those who are singled out because you are too lazy and too afraid to get off your asses lest ye get your head separated from your body.

So, my contempt is deep and limitless with practitioners of mooslim.   Call me a bigot or racist.  I don't give a shit.

Yet, I do sense that humanity can trump the weakness of those who practice the world's most shit hole of religions.

I actually think we should welcome refugees from Syria.    And we should have standards of admission so high that we select one Syrian for a thousand that dare show up begging for mercy.    Well, maybe we could accept two or three....

Our standards for admission should be so high and so cumbersome that only those who can absolutely prove they are innocents and have a life that is so pure that Jesus would lick their asses should ever get in here.

Let's accept the best and those who would have America benefit from their admission!    Let's bring in those who have impeccable documentation of purity and virtue; let's not fall for the sobbing faces of cherubs thinking that they'll remain sweetness and delight; far too many times these wonderful children end up as casting call participants playing Damien Thorpe.    Let's select the finest and the most virtuous - maybe this will only be a dozen out of millions.   Maybe it will be a hundred or a thousand.   But we should never admit someone who has no resume of virtue that can be substantiated.    While it would be painful to see those we reject end up as hamburger in an Ice Piss explosion, better it be those who are too weak and spineless to fight for their own freedom than to admit someone who will turn your mother, sister, or daughter into hamburger before your eyes.

And this tough selection process should be employed on our Southern border - allowing so few that no one would dare waste their time unless they are serious - let's steal the best and the brightest of the world and allow the lazy and foolish to linger in their own shit hole and to face what our founding fathers faced by sticking their necks out to save their own nation.   

Until then, absolutely no miscreant from Syria should be allowed in this country - and to be shipped off to Republican states so we have to act as the world's outhouse.

The Liar in Chief Really Steps in it This Time As I called it earlier, the President's shifting the approval to attack Syria to Congress meshes with his intent to pin the entire failure of the policy on Congress to cover his big fat mouth running at full speed. Obama: 'I Didn't Set a Red Line' on Syria "First of all, I didn't set a red line," said Obama. "The world set a red line. The world set a red line when governments representing 98 percent of the world's population said the use of chemical weapons are [inaudble] and passed a treaty forbidding their use, even when countries are engaged in war. Congress set a red line when it ratified that treaty. Congress set a red line when it indicated that in a piece of legislation entitled the Syria Accountability Act that some of the horrendous things happening on the ground there need to be answered for. So, when I said in a press conference that my calculus about what's happening in Syria would be altered by the use of chemical weapons, which the overwhelming consensus of humanity says is wrong, that wasn't something I just kind of made up. I didn't pluck it out of thin air. There's a reason for it." And here's video of Obama setting a "red line" in regard to Syria, from over a year ago: And here's a background call in April 2013 with “a White House official” that left no doubt about what President Obama's own officials thought about where the red line came from. Read more at The Weekly Standard

DAILY MAIL - Kerry's cosy dinner with Syria's 'Hitler': Secretary of State and the man he likened to German dictator are pictured dining with their wives at Damascus restaurant before civil war broke out An astonishing photograph of John Kerry having a cozy and intimate dinner with Bashar al-Assad has emerged at the moment the U.S Secretary of State is making the case to bomb the Syrian dictator's country and remove him from power. Kerry, who compared Assad to Adolf Hitler and Saddam Hussein yesterday, is pictured around a small table with his wife Teresa Heinz and the Assads in 2009. Assad and Kerry, then a Massachusetts senator, lean in towards each other and appear deep in conversation as their spouses look on. The picture was likely taken in February 2009 in the Naranj restaurant in Damascus, when Kerry led a delegation to Syria to discuss finding a way forward for peace in the region. While President Barack Obama has softened his military threat against Syria by putting the question to Congress and guaranteeing at least a week's delay, Kerry remains outspoken about the dangers posed by the Syrian regime. He said that Assad 'has now joined the list of Adolf Hitler and Saddam Hussein' in deploying chemical weapons against his own people. Kerry said Sunday that the U.S. now has evidence that sarin nerve gas was used in Syria and that 'the case gets stronger by the day' for a military attack. During a passionate speech in Washington last Friday, he called Assad a 'thug and murderer,' and urged the world to act. 'History would judge us all extraordinarily harshly if we turned a blind eye to a dictator,' Kerry insisted. The Obama administration has placed the Syrian chemical weapons death toll on the outskirts of Damascus at 1,429 people - far more than previous estimates - including more than 400 children. The head of the U.N. refugee agency in Syria says seven million Syrians, or almost one-third of the population, have been displaced by the country's civil war. Tarik Kurdi said that five million of the displaced are still in Syria while about 2 million have fled to neighboring countries. He says two million children are among those directly affected by the war. Kurdi says U.N. assistance has been a 'drop in the sea of humanitarian need' and that the funding gap is 'very, very wide.' He says international donors have sent less than one-third of the money needed to help those displaced by the war. More than 100,000 Syrians have been killed since an uprising against Syrian President Bashar Assad erupted in 2011. Kerry has said he is confident that Congress will give Obama its backing for an attack against Syria, but the former Massachusetts senator also said the president has authority to act on his own if Congress doesn't give its approval. While Kerry stopped short of saying Obama was committed to such a course even if lawmakers refuse to authorize force, he did say that 'we are not going to lose this vote.' Comment:  Regardless of the intentions, this image and meeting happened almost immediately after this regime took power and shows its profound disregard for  human rights right off the bat.   Assad has NEVER been a great humanitarian and has always been repressive.

Commentary Imagine this.   A man who won a Nobel Peace prize for doing absolutely nothing - just on the anticipation of the reality of the mythology that has been created around this miscreant - deciding on multiple occasions to seek military solutions to problems that have no impact on American sovereignty or security. In Libya, we had the plan to oust Kadafi Duck rather than just to rattle his cage like the old fart Reagan had done.    Yet, somewhere along the way, President Constipation, our current dear and glorious dictator and progressive tyrant, decided that removing Kadafi Duck was just what the doctor ordered - and then while President Constipation was conjuring up war plans, he melted into the background to play golf and to have dinner with Moochie and the brood at 5 pm just like on every other day.    So instead of leading on his "Obama Doctrine" he just sat on the sidelines and allowed things to happen.   Things got so bad for our President that the phrase "leading from behind" was created to at least turn his indecisiveness and lack of particular energy in the situation into some whimsical form of leadership by inserting it into the title and hoping no one noticed the "behind" part. Make no mistake - President Constipation is particularly skilled in the arts of hide and seek and shifting things to make himself look like more than the pimple of a man he truly is. Given the chance to resolve Afghanistan toward a favorable one for America, when confronted by his generals to do a troop surge, little President Constipation took weeks and months to decide the scope of the "surge".   And when a final decision emerged almost everyone forgot that a surge was asked for and, of  course, President Constipation lead from behind and allowed some troops to be added but not enough to make the plan actually meaningful.   President Constipation added enough bodies to get killed but not enough bodies to make the deaths meaningful in a victory or success. But that is how our President works - he wants to look like he is all important but when it comes down to making a decision, he just is wholly incapable of making one on foreign affairs. This is particularly odd because President constipation knows full well what he wants to do with America - he is blatantly decisive with who will be made to pay for past ills, who will be the props to be exploited for his political gain, and which party he will lambaste in his intent of looking like the royal pimple of a man he wants to be. One wonders why this President doesn't just paint Al Qaeda and militant mooslims as Republicans and evil conservatives and tea party members and go all out on them.   That would make sense if this President actually viewed Al Qaeda, the Mooslim Brotherhood, and their derivatives as the enemy.   He invites the militants to the White House on numerous times and has many of those members on his staff and in upper levels of the agencies in the United States.   He obviously doesn't view the Mooslim Brotherhood as an enemy and that would explain why he worships the Arab Spring like a Solstice to the druid worshipers. That brings us to the Syrian fiasco where President Constipation has once again run his trap trying to fluff himself up into looking like a bold General and ultimately looking like Sergeant Schultz on a vegetarian diet. President Constipation has not uttered the use of the "red line" just a few days or weeks ago after the gassing of over a thousand Syrians. Nope.   Our pimple of a president ran his trap last year about the red line and even the New York Times, the official mouthpiece in written form for this regime, has had to admit, "Mr. Obama also is a victim of his own rhetoric. He first drew a “red line” last year, vowing that any use of weapons of mass destruction by Bashar al-Assad would be unacceptable. It seems clear, say lawmakers who have been briefed, that Mr. Assad ordered the most recent attack, and it wasn’t the first." (New York Times) We can take away from this New York Times analysis that this recent gassing wasn't the first and our President Constipation set the standard of retaliation months or a year ago and is now faced with having to do something regardless of whether doing something is justified. It is striking that weapons of mass destruction should suddenly be exploited by the very miscreants who have spent the better part of a decade mocking it and attacking the prior administration.    Even though the progressive pigs would like you to forget this, Congress approved the attack on Iraq and even President Clinton argued that Iraq had WMD's and even his hag wife has stated her complicity in this position.    Ultimately the case for the existance of the WMD's fell apart like an episode of "Perry Mason", but one has to wonder did the Iraq WMD's actually end up in Syria as was speculated a decade ago and now Assad is hell bent on taking as many with him on the way to 72 toothless, 200 year old virgins with vajayjays so enticing they are like a cross between a belt sander and the sahara desert. President Constipation opened his cake hole on the aftermath of the gassing of 1400 or so Syrians and immediately went to Red alert as if he had just seen a killer rabbit off the port side of the USS Fuckup.   And for a brief moment, the world was nearly on his side, but as is the case with President Constipation, he waited and slowly any country that would support attacking Syria over this gassing disappeared faster than revenue sent to the Federal Government.   In the end, it appears that the coalition of Constipation is now reduced to France and a few south pacific islands. What about "gassing" citizens in a clear civil war is grounds for the US or any other country to attack?    This situation in Syria is a clear civil war - and in war, people die.   That happens.   Some are blown up, some are shot, some are beheaded.   And some are shot, blown up, and hearts eaten. This hand-ringing over "chemical weapons" is pretty senseless in my humble opinion.    Honestly, dead is dead.   How you get there is no more or less wonderful than the other.    It seems that having a bullet to the head is no less outrageous with the skull being shattered and brains blown out with the gushing of blood from a still beating heart than having sucked in air tainted with a gas.   Are we going to suggest that the victims are going to experience a more joyful final end in a bullet to the head than in choking?   Seriously - after a few minutes of time, the brain is starved of oxygen and you die in both cases - having your head partially blown off and not dying instantly is not a walk in the field of daisies death scenario - lying there for minutes as you have enough brain left to run the heart and you ultimately die from not having any blood left to pump as it pools underneath you. Are we basing policy on the number of victims removed from this earth and that the quantity of those who die trumps the actual method?    Does that make a machine gun more reprehensible in a civil war than a hand gun?   Is a bomb fired as part of a missile worse than a grenade? It became apparent in the trials of the Bush WMD's that it wasn't enough that Saddam had used them in the past just like Syria.   Afterall, Saddam used chemical weapons we gave him - and not once has the militant progressive leftist pig neo-hawks stopped to wonder if the Syrians are using gas we gave the Iraqis which make them still our chemical weapons used by another miscreant tyrant.   Or maybe the Syrian chemical weapons are the actual home-brew of Saddam that was shipped off on that mysterious truck convoy captured on film during the opening days of "Operation Saddam's Comeuppance".    So how is it that we can now applaud the actions of President Constipation for pursuing a nation which has used Chemical weapons on his countrymen while slamming Bush for undertaking a payback that his predecessors (including a Democrat) failed to administer?    If it is okay to attack a nation in a civil war that has no actual national security threat to the United States just because it used chemical weapons, then I suggest the same pathetic progressive neo-hawks like President Joe Bite Me apologize for threatening to impeach George W. Bush over doing the same damned thing if he didn't seek Congressional approval - and Bush didn't need to be cajoled into going to Congress as an after thought like President Constipation. In conclusion, we should not attack Syria - this is a civil war and this is what happens.    There are no friends to save in this fight as Assad is just as culpable in supporting terrorism as the "rebels" who include Al Qaeda and militant members of the mooslim brotherhood.    And since it is repugnant to become Al Qaeda's air force to administer destruction the rebels have yet to done, we sadly should sit on the sidelines and let our enemies kill each other and pray that the civilians' God will see them out of the country during the process.    But there is no case that we can fabricate to support attacking Syria given our leftist, progressive saps' prior opinions and positions in other situations that happened before a friend of the mooslim brotherhood became President.