Welcome to the first Andy Rooney interview with Robert Mueller - the Special Prosecutor who didn't know what was in his report but authored a letter telling the Attorney General to not misstate what was in the report. 

Andy Rooney:   "Welcome, Robert Mueller to my heavenly interview.   I realize you aren't yet dead, but after your performance on Wednesday, I'd say people aren't so sure.     How are you today?"

Robert Mueller:  "ah......er......I think you'll find that answer in my report."

Andy Rooney:   "Have you ever wondered what it would like to be a dead person?"

Robert Mueller:  "I can't answer that question since I believe it is part of another investigation."

Andy Rooney:  "I can see this is going to be a long interview."

Robert Mueller:  "What part of the report is that contained.   Can you give me the page number?"

Andy Rooney:  "It is in section three."

Robert Mueller:  "I think that section is missing from my copy.   Can I borrow yours?"

Andy Rooney:  "Why were you hired to investigate Russian interference in our elections and you didn't really investigate anything but Trump?"

Robert Mueller:   " I can't discuss our work product or instructions."

Andy Rooney:  "During your investigation did you ever prove that one vote was changed by Russia from Hillary Clinton to Donald Trump?"

Robert Mueller:  "That was outside of the scope of our investigation."

Andy Rooney:  "What was the scope of your investigation?"

Robert Mueller:  (thirty second pause as Mueller wipes the sweat off his brow) "To nail Trump.  I think."

Andy Rooney:  "Why did all of your lead attorneys that were brought on board all Democrats and had contributed to Hillary Clinton (and not to Trump) and had worked for the Clinton Foundation?   And why were there none that had worked for Trump?"

Robert Mueller:  (thirty second pause as Mueller wipes the sweat off his brow) "To nail Trump.  I think."

Andy Rooney:   "Some say that you did not write this report.   What is your comment on that?"

Robert Mueller:  "I don't remember.   Can you repeat that question?    What part of the report is that from?"

Andy Rooney:   "Do you expect to go to heaven when you finally bite it?"

Robert Mueller:  "What part of the report is that from?"

Andy Rooney:   "Appendix 86"

Robert Mueller:  "That must be in the part that is missing from my copy."

Once upon a time, in a land and time far, far, away, there was Robert Mueller who served in Vietnam and took a bullet.    He was brave in a time when William Jefferson Blythe Clinton dodged the draft through overt actions of cowardice.

Once upon a time, in a land and time much closer to our own, Mueller was starring in his own version of "This is the FBI" where he had developed a reputation of being a stiff that dotted his eyes and wiped his peen to remove the last drop of piss so he'd not soil his undies.

And then there was the Robert Mueller that we saw today who stammered and could not complete a thought without asking for the question to be repeated or could not recall what was in the report that he supposedly authored.    The once proud marine was sadly reduced to an old fool who looked like he'd been released from an old folks home for a few hours.   He was befuddled and confused and often looked one place while in the other direction someone was asking him questions.   Mueller himself said he didn't want to testify and it became apparent that his May speech where he read from a script was because Bob Mueller is not open for business and apparently no one is home either.

What was supposed to be a Democrat orgy of Jerrold Nadler dancing in the nude and the folds of his former five hundred pound self flapping in a dance with his tiny peen and pee-sized nuts, was reduced to a remarkable failure of Democrats to do anything other than to repeat what was already in words and getting the senile Mueller to confirm once in a while; the rest of the time he asked for the soft balls to be thrown again looking in the wrong direction and not evidently being able to process what was in the report that he authored.

Is it any wonder that Robert Mueller didn't want to go in public without a script to read from?    I was left with moments of laughter and appreciating the decline of the man who could be Lurch in the "Adam's Family".   And then I was Snoopy crying my eyes out that a feeble, senile old man was being exploited by the Party of Treason in order to get even with Trump having the Audacity to Take on Witch Hillary and to Bash her with her Broom and then to shove it up her ass.  

If the Democrats thought they'd have ammunition to place in their Impeachment machine, they fired twinkies instead.   This was a laughable failure for the Democrats - perhaps the dumbest political move ever by a political party.    Machiavelli would be laughing from his grave at this putrid attempt to steal political power and he'd demand that all stooges from the Jackass Party be boiled in oil for being so utterly rancid, stupid, and foolish.

Every point that the Democrats alleged to have been proof of obstruction of justice fell short of the target because none of them had any aroma of the intention to obstruct any justice.    For you see, an innocent man could do and say everything Trump did and it is his right to yell, have a temper tantrum, to yell that Mueller should be fired, and to ask peeons to do things.   This is how Trump acts when he doesn't like the way a skank mooslim cunt talks to him.   He isn't seeking to obstruct anything here.   He has every right to voice his declarations of innocence, but his way of doing it does not rise to a criminal action.   The Democrats left it wide open failing to ever show Trump was committed to intent to obstruct - a point refuted by the millions of pages, the hundreds of interviews of his underlings, and the scores of people he actually allowed to testify for Mueller and the Swamp Coup Gang.    And when you consider that the Democrats failed to show how an innocent man was any different than their picture of Trump, the case imploded for Impeachment.    Freedom of Speech and insulting a prosecutor is a right.   And not allowing himself to be interviewed on the prosecutor's terms is not a crime either.   An innocent man has every right to avoid the perjury trap that Mueller would have set - and the threshold for perjury and lying to a prosecutor was as close as being one day off in recollection - just ask Carter Page about his lack of recollection that cost him 11 days in jail!

What was astounding was Mueller had such a wide path to navigate that his search for Russian collusion and the Trump campaign morphed into prosecuting taxi medallion crimes and tax return violations.    And while Mueller was navigating such a wide path, he had to steer away from the Russian collusion that was the 2016 Democrat  campaign of fat kankles and the lie machine, Hillary Clinton.   Somehow only some Russian Collusion was a crime, but that was only enforceable against Trump even though the actual commission of the conspiracy was Hillary Clinton's smashing of digital devices and flushing 33,000 subpoena'd emails down the drain because Hillary didn't want us to know that Chessie was ovulating.

After watching the three first hours, it was quite evident that Robert Mueller is toast - he is so senile and such a shadow of the man he once was that he should sue the Democrat party for ruining his career resume.    And to show that Jerrold Nadler should be one of the first traitors to swing (nude) from a rope after his conviction for treason, Nadler was crowing like he had pulled out a plum from Mueller's ass and all the crimes that Nadler fancied were now there for all to see.

At this time in history, there should be gallows constructed on Capitol Hill and each noose should be placed around the necks of the conspirators, the manifold collection of nearly one hundred Democats, and each dropped so their miserable lives are ended as quickly as possible.    And just for fun, the squad should have five hundred pounds strapped to their ankles so they can be beheaded on the way down to hell.

Americans have been sold a story of Donald Trump and his collusion with Russians to win an election that he otherwise never would have won.   You see, Hillary Clinton was said to be the most prepared candidate to ever run for President and that by virtue of her credentials that she should have won.     Oddly, the American voters remembered that she is also the most dishonest person to ever run and that her political adversaries also end up dead.   Even former friends.   George Washington had a narrative spun about him having not ever told a lie; Hillary Clinton had the reality of her life having never told the truth.

That is what the mainstream news media is selling as they collude with the Democrats, who they have sold their soul for access and power, but there never was a crime proved or any evidence of the commission of a crime that can be used in a court of law.

And to make matters worse, this whole investigation was predicated on a false set of narratives that are in violation of scores of federal laws and rules of evidence that were passed off by the highest office holders in the Department of Justice, the FBI, and all within the Barack Obama administration.

So is it even possible to "obstruct justice" when the foundation of an investigation is completely fabricated and actions that are so close to triggering treason as to lead to the worst political scandal in American history?

Democrats still sting from the impeachment of William Jefferson Blythe Clinton who was said to only have been persecuted for getting fellatio from an intern.    The problem with this Democrat inspired version of reality is that the Independent Counsel found Clinton to have committed 11 prosecutable offenses ranging from perjury  to witness tampering and to actual obstruction of justice.

Fast forward to today where we have a Special Prosecutor that was created out of a myth of Russian Collusion by the Trump campaign in 2016 that could not declare and put on paper any crime committed by the candiate and then later the President, Donald J. Trump.    And with the aroma of treachery from the very start of the investigation slowly wafting from the Washington Swamp, the architect of the Mueller Investigation could not produce a scintilla of criminality which he could even mention in 400 pages of his final report.    And because the narrative of the false Russian collusion case against Donald Trump was predicated on a Russian Dossier financed and completed by the Hillary Clinton campaign along with Ukranian and Russian sources, the Deep State via Robert Mueller and the CIA asswipe known as Brennan and FBI head James Comey, we have infestation of criminality throughout the process from the very start.    This whole affair is a process of injustice that no one has ever seen before in American history.

What was striking about the recent Bob Mueller seven minute reading of a prepared statement was that he had the audacity to claim that he had no evidence to exonerate the President - as if a prosecutor, which he was, has ever declared a person innocent and that our threshold of justice is predicated on the accused having to prove their innocence.   As many legal analysts have stated after the Mueller drivel, he should be disbarred for having the legal understanding of a five year old.

The question is why was the Deep State and the Democrats so intent on preventing Donald Trump from becoming President?

Think about that for a minute.

What are the Democrats hiding?

Because the Mueller Report did not topple Donald J. Trump, the Democrats are now creating the road to impeachment based completely upon more falsehoods that extend in such specious conclusions that Donald Trump obstructed justice.

Justice?    When an investigation is completely predicated on falsehoods and spying upon a political adversary using that false narrative, how can you call what President Trump did obstruction of Justice?    To believe Jerrold Nadler, a man who has an IQ that borrows points at the Carter Administration's prime rate, you have to thus conclude that when someone is innocent has the audacity to fight back that that is obstructing justice.    And because the investigation in the Democrat controlled Congress is duplicating the Mueller report's very investigation tools which including ONLY DEMOCRAT LAWYERS and CLINTON CAMPAIGN  officials, we are supposed to believe that head up his ass Nadler is a better investigator than Sherlock Holmes and will find a crumb left by the Grinch and pull out a mixed metaphor plum that nails Donald J. Trump for not paying for a postage stamp for a letter he mailed in 1975.

What we must remember that there is plenty more evidence that shows that the Russian collusion investigation was based on lies and Hillary Clinton collusion with foreign powers than evidence that Donald J. Trump re-used a stamp that didn't have a postmark on it from a prior mailed letter.    And we know as a fact that not only was Hillary's bought and paid for Russian Dossier used to get the first FISA warrant that started the spying on the Trump campaign, but it was re-used three more times to further the investigation.

Now the Democrats want us to believe that Trump obstructed justice after he allowed his people and documents to be accessed by Mueller et al hundreds of times and millions of pages over.    And because Trump now refuses to feed the political treason of illegality of the Democrats in Congress, he is said to be obstructing justice.

Just remember that to obstruct Justice you actually have to have a just and legal process that is predicated on facts and not crumbs.    And without an investigation into how this whole mess started, you cannot have justice.

But then again, the Democrats are trying ot save their asses from being the party of America hating socialists who want to destroy our Constitution to make their power permanent and their opposition into jail cell residents.

The race is on.

On the one hand the Democrats have a 2020 Presidential election filled with Edsels with no engines and no collectible value.   They must race to damage Trump to the point where he can't be re-elected since he actually has a real chance of being two terms to permanently undo all the damage to the Constitution that the Democrats have done in the last fifty years.

On the other hand the Democrats know full well that their treason and criminal conduct that was conducted during the regime of King Pimple of a Man is fast being exposed for all of its ultra-Watergate level of lawlessness.    This is a sweet irony that one of the minions against Nixon was the low rent Hillary Rodhambone who is now front and center of a real Russian collusion and first class treason case to end all competing stories of such.

The Poisonous Tree in this narrative is in fact the creation of a false case of Russian collusion done by Donald Trump by using a Democrat financed and pushed political operative narrative that was spun into the "Trump Dossier" that was used at least four times to justify FISA warrants and then leaked to the press so that those stories could also be used as justification for those warrants.

The Democrat party has long been ruled by the Clintons - a gang of country bumpkins infused by evil that lurks within the heart of Hillary Rodhambone.    Those in the know and in power of the Democrat party know full well that crossing the Clintons could have you perish in a plane crash or victim of a mysterious suicide or death elsewhere.    The Clintons and their minions make the entire story of the "Sopranos" seem like a Disney movie.

King Pimple of a Man, the clean and articulate black man whose sole achievement to date was reading off a teleprompter like no one has ever read (clean and articulate were characteristics that his vice perpetrator, Joe "Bite Me" Biden attributed to Obama), knew full well that the Clintons, particularly that witch with kankles, were the power brokers to that point in the Democrat party and keeping the witch close to him might buy him more life than pushing her on her fat ass.    Obama and his racist minions were not stupid - they knew Hillary was evil but the alternative to allowing Republicans to win was far worse than inviting the Witch into the fold and risking whatever bad news she could bring forth.

What we have been led to believe is that Obama was a saint and that the Russian collusion narrative was all Trump's fault (even though the Russian threat grew almost entirely during Obama's watch); and with the media being collusion specialists with the Democrats, Obama and Clinton figured that Trump would never win and that all they needed was to give a wiff of Trump impropriety and the voting public would push Hillary's fat ass back into the White House and Obama onto easy street where his actions of destroying American healthcare would be celebrated and enhanced by destroying private insurance.   At no time did Obama and Hillary figure that Trump would win.   Yet, even evil knows that you can't put all your eggs in one basket and that you needed a head to add to it to scare the public away from Trump.

The Trump Russian Dossier has now been officially disclosed as fake and even its author acknowledges that none of it can be verified.   In short, this sole aspect that served as the seminal item in opening the collusion investigation is bogus and unlawful and is poisonous fruit from a tree sprouted from dishonesty, treason, and unethical conduct.    The Obama administration is so much deeper involved in this situation than we have been told and the Democrats know this.    The race to get Trump before 2020 was supposed to have already been taken care of.   Trump was not supposed to survive and the narrative of him being stupid and unhinged was supposed to get him to resign and to hand the reigns of power to Mike Pence who has the charisma of toilet paper and would be easy prey for the Democrats (even for Biden) in 2020.

Nancy Pelosi, a fatal case of mad cow and dementia destroying her powers of communication, is still alert enough (in between stammers) to know that impeaching Trump is suicide for the Democrats; yet, at every turn, the options to get Trump have been eliminated and no one figured Trump would withstand the treason of the mainstream media colluding with Russians and Democrats.   Yet at every turn, Trump has managed to make an action that eats at the protective wall that has hidden Democrat crimes and treason.

What we now have now is a race to get Trump before we find Obama is Nixon on steroids and the entire Democrat party and the entire mainstream news media are traitors fit for hanging on Capitol Hill.  

Mark my word, Mueller's "news conference" was a dog whistle to the deep state and to Democrats that is like Paul Revere's ride (a false story in itself) is saying the British are coming and that Impeachment must now proceed.

This is going to be delicious since had Bob Mueller actually had a case about Trump's Obstruction, Mueller would not have hidden behind the fake story of not being able to indict a standing President.   And note for the record, Mueller lied when he said that this was his case since he and the current Attorney General in front of witnesses told the AG that there was NEVER any consideration of that "can't indict a standing President" ever in the Mueller investigation!

Also dangling before Mueller prior to his hanging on treason, is the fact that early on Mueller discovered that there was NO RUSSIAN collusion by Trump and that he still allowed over a year and a half of this charade to proceed ensnaring countless innocent people to be forced into plea deals after threats to adult children and spouses were leveraged to get Trump on anything.    As there was discovery that Trump had not colluded, Mueller committed one of the highest levels of crime possible by a government official and he is now trying to save his ass before his ass is dangling from a rope.

The Grand Dragon in the Russian Witch Hunt was the FBI director when Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sold off a significant portion of our uranium reserves to the Russians; and then Bill Clinton was given $500,000 for a speech in Russian.

Against the Clintons, Bob Mueller did nothing.   Said nothing.   Operation "Ghost Story" was underway and resulted in the purging of tens of Russian agents.   But Hillary and Bill Clinton escaped unharmed even as $145 million went to the Clinton Family Crime Foundation.

And now he is overseeing the inquisition over Russian influence in the last election against Hillary's opponent, Donald J. Trump!

From Mediate:  "Is it time for Special Counsel Robert Mueller to recuse himself from his investigation into Russian activities in the 2016 presidential election?

Lost in much of the discussion over this week’s developments in the growing Russia/Uranium/Clinton scandal is the fact that none other than Mueller was the FBI Director during this investigation. And that investigation is under serious scrutiny.

Under Attorney General Eric Holder, the FBI informant at the center of the probe was prohibited from revealing any of the details of the investigation to members of Congress because of a non-disclosure agreement that has been characterized as unusual by the informant’s attorney, Victoria Toensing.

In fact, as the Obama Administration was weighing the sale of uranium to a Russian-backed firm, none of the details of the active FBI criminal investigation were disclosed by the Executive Branch to Congress. Then-House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers told The Hill:    He had never been told anything about the Russian nuclear corruption case even though many fellow lawmakers had serious concerns about the Obama administration’s approval of the Uranium One deal.

Yesterday, President Donald Trump called out the media for their obsessive coverage of the as-of-now-evidence-free Russia/Collusion story while not probing deeper into the Russian/Uranium/Clinton scandal which blew-up this week thanks to investigative reporting by John Solomon at The Hill and Sara Carter at Circa. He might want to have a conversation with Mueller and his own Deputy Attorney General as well.

Not only is Special Counsel Mueller tied-up in the uranium imbroglio, but the person supervising the investigation was then-US Attorney Rod Rosenstein. Rosenstein is now the Deputy Attorney General and after Jeff Sessions recused himself from the Russian meddling case it was Obama appointee Rosenstein who decided to name none other than Mueller as Special Counsel for the probe."

But wait... There is more.    

Bob Mueller is an unprincipled, witch-hunting, unethical man.

From WGBH News:  "Is special counsel Robert S. Mueller III, appointed in mid-May to lead the investigation into suspected ties between Donald Trump’s campaign and various shady (aren’t they all?) Russian officials, the choirboy that he’s being touted to be, or is he more akin to a modern-day Tomas de Torquemada, the Castilian Dominican friar who was the first Grand Inquisitor in the 15th Century Spanish Inquisition?

Given the rampant media partisanship since the election, one would think that Mueller’s appointment would lend credibility to the hunt for violations of law by candidate, now President Trump and his minions.

But I have known Mueller during key moments of his career as a federal prosecutor. My experience has taught me to approach whatever he does in the Trump investigation with a requisite degree of skepticism or, at the very least, extreme caution.

When Mueller was the acting United States Attorney in Boston, I was defense counsel in a federal criminal case in which a rather odd fellow contacted me to tell me that he had information that could assist my client. He asked to see me, and I agreed to meet. He walked into my office wearing a striking, flowing white gauze-like shirt and sat down across from me at the conference table. He was prepared, he said, to give me an affidavit to the effect that certain real estate owned by my client was purchased with lawful currency rather than, as Mueller’s office was claiming, the proceeds of illegal drug activities.

My secretary typed up the affidavit that the witness was going to sign. Just as he picked up the pen, he looked at me and said something like: “You know, all of this is actually false, but your client is an old friend of mine and I want to help him.” As I threw the putative witness out of my office, I noticed, under the flowing white shirt, a lump on his back – he was obviously wired and recording every word between us.

Years later I ran into Mueller, and I told him of my disappointment in being the target of a sting where there was no reason to think that I would knowingly present perjured evidence to a court. Mueller, half-apologetically, told me that he never really thought that I would suborn perjury, but that he had a duty to pursue the lead given to him. (That “lead,” of course, was provided by a fellow that we lawyers, among ourselves, would indelicately refer to as a “scumbag.”)

This experience made me realize that Mueller was capable of believing, at least preliminarily, any tale of criminal wrongdoing and acting upon it, despite the palpable bad character and obviously questionable motivations of his informants and witnesses. (The lesson was particularly vivid because Mueller and I overlapped at Princeton, he in the Class of 1966 and me graduating in 1964.)

Years later, my wariness toward Mueller was bolstered in an even more revelatory way. When he led the criminal division of the U.S. Department of Justice, I arranged in December 1990 to meet with him in Washington. I was then lead defense counsel for Dr. Jeffrey R. MacDonald, who had been convicted in federal court in North Carolina in 1979 of murdering his wife and two young children while stationed at Fort Bragg. Years after the trial, MacDonald (also at Princeton when Mueller and I were there) hired me and my colleagues to represent him and obtain a new trial based on shocking newly discovered evidence that demonstrated MacDonald had been framed in part by the connivance of military investigators and FBI agents. Over the years, MacDonald and his various lawyers and investigators had collected a large trove of such evidence.

The day of the meeting, I walked into the DOJ conference room, where around the table sat a phalanx of FBI agents. My three colleagues joined me. Mueller walked into the room, went to the head of the table, and opened the meeting with this admonition, reconstructed from my vivid and chilling memory: “Gentlemen: Criticism of the Bureau is a non-starter.” (Another lawyer attendee of the meeting remembered Mueller’s words slightly differently: “Prosecutorial misconduct is a non-starter.” Either version makes clear Mueller’s intent – he did not want to hear evidence that either the prosecutors or the FBI agents on the case misbehaved and framed an innocent man.)

Special counsel Mueller’s background indicates zealousness that we might expect in the Grand Inquisitor, not the choirboy."