I'm tired of the blubbering children used as props to exploit and to leverage acceptance of law-breaking.

And immigration advocates are advocating law breaking on the backs of blubbering children.

It does not make any difference that we have tens of millions of people in this country who arrived by breaking the rules - breaking laws - and stealing the life of Americans.    Those who are illegal aliens are some of the most selfish people on the planet - thinking they have the right to steal passage here and to break our laws by placing them ahead of those who have the audacity to wait and to follow our immigration policies.

Our President, King Pimple of a Man the first, is finding that acting like a spoiled brat and a monarch no longer works.    Several courts have slammed this jackass in the face and rebuked his illegal actions.

Thankfully we still have a fence toward awarding illegal aliens carte blanche admission.   While it is not a fence that will cause fatality should you dare to touch it or to cross it, we at least have some rule of law that prevents the mass acceptance of people who have no right to be here.

Yes, it is sad that we have anchor babies here - now tens of years old - but that is not America's problem to solve.   Selfish people who put themselves above the law have squatted here without any right.    It is not America's problem to fix other than to make life a living hell for all illegal aliens.

At no point in our laws do illegal aliens have a right to be employed.   In fact, it is illegal to hire people who do not have the authorization to be here.   We should enforce without regard to severity of punishment the laws that punish employers for hiring illegal aliens.   If we have to close businesses and to destroy them financially, oh well.    There is no right to have a job here - and illegal aliens are stealing jobs our welfare asswipes should be taking.

We should be making it impossible for illegal aliens to rent or to buy property.   We should be prosecuting those who harbor or give safe harbor any illegal alien.   We should prevent educating any illegal alien brat - we are stuck educating anchor babies - but we should immediately shut off all education to brats not born here.  

Once the life of an illegal alien - a law breaker as their first action here - becomes inhospitable, we can then ensure they leave.   Regardless of cost, we should uproot and to drop them back to south of the border.   I don't care where these illegals came from - we should dump them onto Mexico and let them deal with it.

I know it is now fashionable to fabricate claims of asylum here - life sucks - it is not our fault you were born into a pathetic country with gangs and drug cartels.    Your plight is not ours.   And we should not be making wholesale asylum grants to mass populations.   We have our own pathetic areas like Los Angeles, Chicago, and Baltimore where there is lawlessness.   We need to handle our own miscreants - we don't need to add contrived claims of bad lives so we can admit drunk drivers, mass murderers, drug dealers, or child rapists here because the life is too harsh elsewhere.

Our President needs to enforce our laws or we need to impeach and to remove him.   The courts are already rebuking him on being lawless.    It is time Congress does its job and reads him the riot act - enforce the laws or your ass is grass.

Click here to learn more

Our President is an unfortunate one – he was elected, however voluntarily, to oversee a period in American history that has been filled with tough choices. And we realize that in revisionist history that no President has faced such a collection of misfortune that has been bestowed on a man so intent on forever changing America. We cannot begin to compare the state of the country that our current President has had to oversee – he wasn’t told, after all, about the horrific state of the economy even as he had the benefit of the internet and had a class-best computerized campaign that was state of the art in all regards. Our President cannot be compared with the Presidents before him as if the state of the union under which Abraham Lincoln could be compared to what our first half black President had to face. We cannot begin to fathom the difficulties of those taking over the real Great Depression and then having to endure a world war with so many different armies that we were fighting the first true multi-cultural war. Poor FDR – he knew not what he had – a walk in the park – and he didn’t even have the internet to tell him the economy was far worse than he knew – but because he was more than half white, it begs the question why he didn’t just know. It goes without saying that when a President takes over an economy on the decline, something that we all know was the first time this happened to a President elect on the day of his inauguration, that we must shed pity on him – and we must also give him some slack since he’s never managed anything other than to campaign. With a skill set so limited as his and having been a United States Senator for mere days, he can’t possibly be expected as a Constitutional Scholar to know the full extent of anything. And we know that no other President in history has ever had to take over for a President named Bush except if you consider George Herbert Walker Bush being a Bush President. But that would be to render a comparison between the first black president to ever get elected to the first half black president to ever get elected. Why bother with history when the narrative we’ve been told is just so much more delicious?! And so our President now has to face terrorism – a fact that no other President has ever had to face – and this President has to decide when to pull out which is obviously something he didn’t do twice in his history. But when at war and when we had a chance to win, pulling out for him was a way to reverse success and to keep a few campaign promises. And while the prior president may not have had an exit strategy we can’t possibly expect his successor, born in Hawaii and having smoked weed and sold crack to finance his college education at Ivy League schools, to possibly know what an exit strategy was. But his predecessor should have know since he was an evil oil president who did not have over 1290 consecutive days of gasoline over $3.00 per gallon during his term like our current one has had. And the consecutive streak will continue to grow. Meanwhile, we have this problem with folks who want to enter through our windows and doors who weren’t invited and have never received a hand written invitation to be here. Yet because these uninvited guests are of an ethnicity we are supposed to embrace and to excuse their ignorance of the rule of law, we should just unbolt our doors, remove our fences, and open the windows and invite these poor folks from down south to have some of what we worked for. And we don’t even need to ask if these folks should work to get what we did, we should just suck it up and give them a chance – as if we tried the same thing climbing through their windows that we’d be given jack – we’d be given jail time like a US Marine has been and sent to a jail where he was going to be executed by wonderful drug gangs.  In the past, we have put up some resistance to the infestation from the south – we said “no” like a coed who was on top of her nude boyfriend. We even said “no” a second time, like that same coed did as she also joined her hunk in total nudity. But somehow, just saying no wasn’t good enough for us, but was good and proper evidence for the coed that when her boyfriend went the extra inch, he was charged with rape and the infestation progressed across the border without punishment. We actually do have laws on the books to make it illegal for an employer to hire an illegal alien – we have tripled our border guards according to our President’s own pure as the new fallen white snow’s mouth – and we also built a fence somewhere that was supposed to make it a speed bump for those who wanted to go through the door but had to choose one of the windows. We’ve even heard from the President’s sycophants that he has deported more illegals than any other President ever (even though they never also mention he has added more national debt than all of the presidents before him as well). And while the claim of deportations is completely bogus and proved dishonest by the fact that Homeland Security has suspended deportations per the President’s wink, smoke signal, and secret handshake, we are supposed to believe that this latest situation where babies in diapers crawled nearly 1000 miles as something that just caught the brightest men and women ever to be assembled in office totally off guard. Did you even know that currently those tripled border guards are now not actually policing the border? They are now changing diapers and are charged with preventing the people’s own Congressional Representatives from seeing what is going on in person. And then the President claims that Congress has never given him anything to sign into law – perhaps our Constitutional scholar president forgot that bills by the House go to the Senate to vote on and then to his desk to sign. Something like a hard drive crash ate the House bills on immigration that were sent to the Senate to vote on. Perhaps Harry Reid should look between his copies of Hustler to see if he can find a few of those bills because space aliens could be stealing the bills from the House that never seem to get voted on in the Senate! We are told that these new children who are fleeing their homeland aren’t just Mexicans fleeing beheadings from drug gangs. These new children are a multicultural rag tag bunch from Central America – and they manage to find their way through jungles, drug lords, desert, and other obstacles and traverse over a thousand miles to get here to the promised land – and woe and behold – not only are the doors and windows open, but we’ve opened the garage door, opened and deactivated all alarms, and our fence just doesn’t exist – and those tripled border guards are not guarding jack even as the President whines and threatens.

You also have to marvel at how these children who haven’t even grown up enough to procreate have managed to avoid Mexican border guards who are notorious for sending Central Americans to jail with all due haste – if there is one country that takes their border crossings seriously, it is the Mexicans. You can’t even sneeze from your side of the front yard to their back yard without being sent to prison.  So how is it that these children made this trip without being seized? So we now have tens of thousands of pre and post pubescent children at old Walmarts and old military bases – wrapped at night in foil blankets – and getting free medical care that our Veterans have to wait on two waiting lists to get and are only invited for care two years after they died. We are told these children may or may not be able to stay, but let’s assume that the President’s lack of serious attention on this matter means he wants them to stay – after all, if the President really was upset with this, he’d fire the head of the department (or allow him or her to retire), he’d purse his lips and say he is so upset, and then he’d attack Republicans and play golf. So he must really want these non-gringos to stay, we must therefore implore him to act as follows: (1) Mr. President. Tear down your White House fence. If a fence won’t stop jack, yours needs to go. I’m sure the Tea Party will come over and pull the focking fence up and even remove it and send it to be recycled. (2) Mr. President. Get rid of your guards. We know you’ve been so vocal about numbers, so let’s make your body guards do what you have made our border guards do – let’s bring up some welfare brood mares and their collection of mult-baby daddies offspring and have the guards change diapers and wipe asses and baby sit. After all, what is good for your multicultural brats should be good for your own kinds’. (3) Mr. President. You need to go through each incoming Hispanic child and determine if any of them want to get married to another same sex traveler. You should act now to guarantee these children the opportunity to go gay early and with the obligations that we know gays expect. And in case that one of these children is ill, the gay partner can visit and can prepare the funeral details. (4) Mr. President. We have to be concerned about these children – perhaps these children left bad families in search of good ones, so let’s compel every registered Democrat voter to practice their bleeding hearts by being REQUIRED to take several of these southern roaches in as members of their own families. I’m sure that these Democrats will practice what they preach and should be so happy to give a few of these TB and Scabies carriers a home on the Upper East side. And then to make it even more compelling to show the good faith nature of these loving Democrats, let’s bill them for the costs of accepting their new children to this country. We could even hire Sally Struthers to implore the Democrats to pay a couple large for each child as handling costs. (5) Mr. President. I think that you should immediately launch Moochie to spend perhaps a year as a missionary going into the infected holding rooms of these children and to spread her love by lecturing them on healthy eating and to ensure that no child has to endure eating French fries and hamburgers – and to scold them for eating tacos and burritos. You know your wife is just the bitch who can handle this – look at you when you get away from her snacking and scarfing down on food that isn’t on her healthy list. Imagine all the tasty food you can eat when Moochie is gone for a year! (6) Mr. President. I think you should chase down all of the undocumented migrants who have not signed up for Obamacare and compel them to pay the penalty like the rest of us will have to do – think of the revenue you can use to get out the vote by diverting government funds to the Democrats’ Congressional campaigns! (7) Perhaps you could send illegal aliens to fight in Iraq – you could show you are tough on immigration and tough on the militant mooslims since some of these wonderful illegal aliens had prior employment in Mexican gangs – and those dudes and dudettes know how to cut off heads with chainsaws and sharp knives – these dudes could really show the ISIS guys how to use more than bullets and butter knives to do the killing. And after you’ve sent a few million illegals to iraq, you’ve solved the problem here and you could consider the “deported” Mexicans as military equipment and just not bring it back after the fighting has died. And just think, you won’t even burden the VA with more real soldiers coming back with medical issues! (8) You could even give your daughters summer jobs by having them come up with catchy social media signs that they can hold up like “#can you spare a focking dime for our children?” (9) Mr. President. Apparently Sandra Fluke, a professional hired slut for birth control, needs to oversee the female children and to teach them that having men buy them contraceptives is a right and that no woman (or girl) should ever have to spend a dime to prevent pregnancy. And, Sandra could also teach the girls that if they call “M&M’s” as medicine, that makes it so so there should be a right for women to compel men to pay for free “M&M’s”. (10) Finally, Mr. President, perhaps you could take a few rounds of golf and do it in front of the children so they could desire being you someday – a man who is so concerned about so many things and finding time to play more golf than any president in history during the same times, during such conflict, and strife that you caused. You could show the children that you play golf for the children and that you even have rainbow socks on so you can show your support for the transgendered children who think that they are female when they have male parts. I think you’ll agree this proposal is quite modest and its points are as delicious as they are intended.

Witch Pelosi (Democrat) will greet the infestation of underage southern roaches

Perhaps "Common Sense" Immigration Reform Should Adopt Mexican Immigration Standards and Let Illegal Aliens Get a Taste of "Home Cooking" Once again we are facing the calls to update our immigration policy to make legitimate thieves of the American experience who have no right to be here and are breaking a myriad of U.S. laws by residing here after selfishly crossing our borders. Of course the appeal will be based on turning this into a sob story - that these "poor people" are doing no harm and only wanted to better themselves.   And because this debate is being shaped in the terms of a sob story, this somehow mitigates the fact that every illegal alien is unlawfully here (duh), a criminal by that action, and has no right to be here in the first place.    So let's just ignore these transgressions against American laws and reshape the situation so that it benefits the Democrat party (race-baiters of the first order) and American businesses who want lots of cheap labor to exploit.     The Democrats benefit because the party is a professional race-mongering party that exploits fabricated racial claims to expand their voting base.   Once upon a time Democrats seemed truly serious about SOLVING racial issues, but today's Democrat party is a Progressive party - one that hides its communist and socialist ideals under the guise of being "progressive" and that there are no Democracts living today that would have been considered Democrats in JFK's day.   The Democrat party has been hijacked by extremists who mask their extremism by claiming all their enemies are extremists and nuts.   Democrats and spineless rat bastard Republicans who aren't really Republicans but schills for Big Business, are willing to sell out the country for their political gain. I found this article on another website and am reproducing hit now for you to view.      --------------- Mexico has a radical idea for a rational immigration policy that most Americans would love. However, Mexican officials haven't been sharing that idea with us as they press for our Congress to adopt the McCain-Kennedy immigration reform bill. That's too bad, because Mexico, which annually deports more illegal aliens than the United States does, has much to teach us about how it handles the immigration issue. Under Mexican law, it is a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico. At a time when the Supreme Court and many politicians seek to bring American law in line with foreign legal norms, it's noteworthy that nobody has argued that the U.S. look at how Mexico deals with immigration and what it might teach us about how best to solve our illegal immigration problem.  Mexico has a single, streamlined law that ensures that foreign visitors and immigrants are: in the country legally; have the means to sustain themselves economically; not destined to be burdens on society; of economic and social benefit to society; of good character and have no criminal records; and contributors to the general well-being of the nation. The law also ensures that: immigration authorities have a record of each foreign visitor; foreign visitors do not violate their visa status; foreign visitors are banned from interfering in the country's internal politics; foreign visitors who enter under false pretenses are imprisoned or deported; foreign visitors violating the terms of their entry are imprisoned or deported; those who aid in illegal immigration will be sent to prison. Mexico's Immigration Law:  Let's Try It Here in the USA Who could disagree with such a law? It makes perfect sense. The Mexican constitution strictly defines the rights of citizens -- and the denial of many fundamental rights to non-citizens, illegal and illegal. Under the constitution, the Ley General de Població® ¯r General Law on Population, spells out specifically the country's immigration policy. It is an interesting law -- and one that should cause us all to ask, Why is our great southern neighbor pushing us to water down our own immigration laws and policies, when its own immigration restrictions are the toughest on the continent? If a felony is a crime punishable by more than one year in prison, then Mexican law makes it a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico. If the United States adopted such statutes, Mexico no doubt would denounce it as a manifestation of American racism and bigotry. We looked at the immigration provisions of the Mexican constitution. [ 1 ] Now let's look at Mexico's main immigration law. Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society: Foreigners are admitted into Mexico "according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress." (Article 32) Immigration officials must "ensure" that "immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance" and for their dependents. (Article 34) Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets "the equilibrium of the national demographics," when foreigners are deemed detrimental to "economic or national interests," when they do not behave like good citizens in their own country, when they have broken Mexican laws, and when "they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy." (Article 37) The Secretary of Governance may "suspend or prohibit the admission of foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest." (Article 38) Mexican authorities must keep track of every single person in the country: Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal immigration authorities upon request, i.e., to assist in the arrests of illegal immigrants. (Article 73) A National Population Registry keeps track of "every single individual who comprises the population of the country," and verifies each individual's identity. (Articles 85 and 86) A national Catalog of Foreigners tracks foreign tourists and immigrants (Article 87), and assigns each individual with a unique tracking number (Article 91). Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned: Foreigners with fake immigration papers may be fined or imprisoned. (Article 116) Foreigners who sign government documents "with a signature that is false or different from that which he normally uses" are subject to fine and imprisonment. (Article 116) Foreigners who fail to obey the rules will be fined, deported, and/or imprisoned as felons: Foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be punished. (Article 117) Foreigners who are deported from Mexico and attempt to re-enter the country without authorization can be imprisoned for up to 10 years. (Article 118) Foreigners who violate the terms of their visa may be sentenced to up to six years in prison (Articles 119, 120 and 121). Foreigners who misrepresent the terms of their visa while in Mexico -- such as working with out a permit -- can also be imprisoned. Under Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony. The General Law on Population says, "A penalty of up to two years in prison and a fine of three hundred to five thousand pesos will be imposed on the foreigner who enters the country illegally." (Article 123) Foreigners with legal immigration problems may be deported from Mexico instead of being imprisoned. (Article 125) Foreigners who "attempt against national sovereignty or security" will be deported. (Article 126) Mexicans who help illegal aliens enter the country are themselves considered criminals under the law: A Mexican who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping the foreigner live in the country is subject to up to five years in prison. (Article 127) Shipping and airline companies that bring undocumented foreigners into Mexico will be fined. (Article 132) All of the above runs contrary to what Mexican leaders are demanding of the United States. The stark contrast between Mexico's immigration practices versus its American immigration preachings is telling. It gives a clear picture of the Mexican government's agenda: to have a one-way immigration relationship with the United States. Let's call Mexico's bluff on its unwarranted interference in U.S. immigration policy. Let's propose, just to make a point, that the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) member nations standardize their immigration laws by using Mexico's own law as a model.   This article was first posted at CenterforSecurityPolicy.org. 1. "Mexico's Glass House," Center for Security Policy Occasional Paper, April 3, 2006. Dr. Waller is vice president for Information Operations at the Center for Security Policy. A journalist and author, he brings expertise in terrorism, intelligence, the former Soviet Union and the Americas. He previously served as a consultant to the U.S. Department of State.

There is a huge debate going on in Washington trying to justify giving special treatment to tens of millions of illegal immigrants. "There are too many of them to deport them all" "These people are nice people." "People who are against immigrants are really racists against Hispanics." The excuses for justifying special treatment of illegal immigrants is manifold.   We've heard them all.   And like all justifications for giving these illegal immigrants special treatment, using one on race is one of the lowest and most repugnant.   But proponents of illegal aliens have no moral or intellectual center.   They are repulsive folks who have neither the law nor the rights of man on their side. Let's examine what happens when you become an illegal immigrant. As a person crosses from one country into the United States without permission or sanctioned papers, that person instantly is a law-breaker.    Those people who enter with papers and stay past the expiration of those documents become law-breakers. I would suggest that anyone who feels compassion for the illegal aliens in this country to google the laws dealing with illegal aliens in the country from which those folks fled.    You will find that every country seeks to deport illegal aliens - and there is more punishment as well.    Since it is apparent that bleeding hearts do not think when they show compassion for illegal aliens, I want to make this personal for advocates for illegal immigrants. Imagine for a moment that the person who becomes an illegal alien is crossing your house's threshold instead of the US border.    Since crossing that threshold into your house is unlawful (you granted no permission), that is exactly the same thing as someone crossing our border without permission.   Imagine if that border crosser is now at your back door with a pry bar and breaks in just like he would if he cut our fence or burrowed under it.    Another instance of unlawful entry. When a person crosses our border (or into your house) without permission, do you care about their motives?   Imagine if both persons "just wanted to get food for their family" (typical leftist excuse for illegal aliens). Do you care if the forced entry into your home was only for food?    Imagine this is in the dark of night - out of your view and the illegal alien did it without calling notice to himself.    Does that make the crime less of a crime? Imagine if the "burglar" decided he liked it in your house (as opposed to his) and he figured staying in your house was okay.   His intentions, after all, are just wonderful. He just wants to feed his kids. So the burglar takes up residence in your attic - you don't see or hear him.   He finds a day job while standing on a street corner and works under the table with a construction company.   He makes cash money and then starts leaving money on your kitchen table every once in a while.   He pays for his food or your electricity. After a while, he's been there for months and he figures that his duration of stay gives him squatter's rights to your house so he comes out of the shadows and decides he deserves to be granted legal owner status of the house - albeit a shared one.    He has committed no offense while here and he's even mowed your lawn without being asked - he's cleaned your toilets - he does the jobs you refuse to do.    He buys things in your town, pays sales taxes just like everyone else.    He even picks up his own trash and throws it away - unlike you. Then this burglar decides that since you don't have anything in this house that is in his language, you should be forced to speak his native language.   After all, he's been here long enough to make his presence important and justifiable.   So he decides to sue you to have bilingual this and bilingual that. Since this person in this example has conducted himself just like every other illegal immigrant, border crosser, American Experience thief, how is it that he should be granted a right to your house because of his intentions and motives?   Does not the law mean anything?   Why are we suddenly going to excuse him from seeking part ownership of your house just because he has been a good boy and supports his family?

Much has been stated about the reasons why we should have "comprehensive immigration reform", but few are based on anything other than feelings. Let's strip emotion from the debate and let's consider the hard reality of immigration. Nations have every right to pre-define what their immigration policy will be - that is, what constitutes legal immigration and to codify the provisions and to set penalties for breaking the laws.    Over time, immigration standards may change as needed and as nations evolve.   Nations and States have every responsibility to define who will be let in and who will not be.   Nations who seek population growth also want people who will contribute and who will not become burdens on the legal society.    There is every expectation that an immigrant, chosen on a case by case basis, should add to the gross domestic product of the country he/she is seeking as a new residence.   There is every duty of a Nation to limit anyone who will cost the overall society in economic or health terms.    Nations do not have to even justify their definitions of who is going to be allowed.   Each nation has a right to restrict whom it wants or to grant entry in a legal way who it wants.   Immigration need not follow a politically correct or bleeding heart standard.    There is no justification to grant admission as a citizen or visit based on any terms other than strict contribution to the nation which balances growth of the economy against mooches on the government dole.    Nations have a burden to their citizens to not exacerbate unemployment and fiscal issues by taking on a greater burden when the nation cannot support that. What also must be considered is that no person who is born in one nation has any claim to live or to become a citizen in another nation.    There is no right to live where you damned want if it means you have to cross the boundary of one nation to live in another.   There is simply no grounds in the U.S. Constitution to guarantee you a right to enter this nation if you were not born in this nation. We hear so often that there are tens of millions of people who are living here who have violated almost every immigration law on the books.   Either these people have entered the country against our laws or have over-stayed their temporary permission to live or visit here.    The proponents of immigration reform try to use the excuse of the multiplicity of criminality as an excuse to find a way to allow these folks to stay; however, there is no provision in any national immigration law that grants a law-breaker the right to turn illegality into legal status of any kind.   Furthermore, duration of the good-tenure of those law-breakers is not a factor that can be considered to make them turn from illegal status to legal status.    You have no right to expect that being in violation of one or more laws will allow you at a future time to become legal.     There is also no provision to make any ethnic group a preferential group just because they make up the plurality of the law breakers.    It is simply repugnant to suggest that because you are Hispanic and the majority of the immigration law-breakers are Hispanic that you are owed shit and should have your illegality forgiven just for the hell of it. Proponents of a pathway to citizenship actually make a mockery of immigration law - tens of thousands of people actually do follow the law and do follow immigration provisions that we have established as law.    How is it that we can suddenly allow an ethnic group to have preferential treatment just because they have been here so long and there are so many of them that we cannot possibly get rid of them all! Oh, really?! What should be done is to immediately notify all employers that you have a responsibility to only hire legal immigrants and citizens.   Failure to comply with strict enforcement of I-9 requirements should be met with significant penalties up to and including closing your business down. There should be notice made to all landlords and real estate companies that any and all restrictions on rental and property transfers to non-legal residents will be enforced and all fines, imprisonment, and property forfeiture should be enforced. Making life miserable for law-breakers is the only avenue that we have available with regard to the immigration problem.   Any and all immigrants who are in violation of one or more immigration laws enacted since 1986 when the last (and supposedly final immigration law was enacted) should feel the pain of being forcibly removed at their expense and without remorse for their personal plight - you arrived here in violation of immigration laws and should not expect an ounce of consideration for your private situation.   Your longevity of your illegal stay and your contributions to society have no factor in determining your guilt or innocence with regards to the laws you have violated. Yes, there should be the fear in the heart of all illegal immigrants that they could be deported without mercy.    There can be no mercy shown those who are so selfish and arrogant as to think they are better than those people who choose to wait their legal turn for immigration.    And if the actions of the nation to enforce the laws results in the death of illegal immigrants, then so be it. There can be no grounds of compassion extended to immigrants who are effectively criminals each and every day they live in a country they have no right to occupy.    Just because you may be doing the job that is asserted that "no American" would work does not give you the reason to enter this nation illegally. If this nation does in fact need to expand temporary work provisions for legal aliens, let's address that issue and immediately disqualify any illegal alien who is in this country from applying.   Let's not give these thieves of the American experience any credit for time "served" and let's ensure they benefit in no way from stealing their time here.    In fact, let us permanently ban any illegal alien who is here after 1986 from ever being a citizen and from ever getting any benefits or healthcare or education.    Let's force these illegal immigrants to leave this nation and to take their families with them or to leave their children born here to be placed in legal adoptions. The fact that so many illegal immigrants live here should NEVER have any influence on policy.    The challenge for us to deport all of these thieves is daunting, but we should be resolved to enforce with the strictest level of judicial prejudice our immigration laws.    Zero tolerance on those who are now here without legal authorization should be our standard - nothing less.   Our hearts should not enter into a situation that is clear cut - in order to get here, these people broke laws.   And we cannot lower our immigration standards to make law-breakers our base from which we choose as future citizens and residents.

In today's America, we no longer want to deal with the reality of the mess we have.   We want to find a way to hide our problems and then to repackage those mistakes into something wonderful. And so we now must find a way to call those thieves of the American experience something nicer.    Those who once stole their participation in America were called "illegal aliens".    Now they are being repackaged as "undocumented aliens" and seen as a growing group of people to exploit for cheap labor and even cheaper votes. I admit I am old school.   I believe that if you aren't born into America after the country was created, you have no right to be here unless you pursue legal actions.    You see, most countries that exist have standards by which you can enter their borders and even have standards by which you follow to become a citizen.   And if you don't follow those standards, you aren't looked upon as a potential source of income nor are you seen as a potential voter.   You are deported. In America, however, because we have allowed illegal aliens to remain here for so long, we now feel pity for them and because they have dropped their babies onto American soil, how can we actually be so cruel as to now send them back?    That isn't fair! Senator John McCain caught an earful when he was holding town hall meetings recently about immigration and he didn't seem very happy that there are people, like me and the guy above, who resent allowing anyone who steals something to have a pathway to being legitimate.   I certainly wouldn't view a robber who invaded my home without permission to have a way to stay here and to eat my food or to live rent free even if government demanded he paid a fine just to make it look like he's paid a price! There is actually "sensitivity" training being conducted in this Administration whereby the Pilgrims are said to be illegal aliens even though there was no country here when they arrived.   And before you miscreants of logic think that Native Americans are all historically wonderful people, the fact is that when you are conquered and a new system of government is implemented, you cease to have claim on anything unless you take it back with force.   And since their government has been replaced with ours, anyone who arrives here after the creation have only two avenues of recourse - follow our rules, or bring an army and overthrow our government and culture.    Occupying space as a squatter doesn't count for squat.    You have been served notice you are illegal - now get the hell out! I also have to look at how Mexico treats illegal aliens and they don't mess around.   They deport.   Mexico actually has more punitive rules about what non-citizens can do than we have and I think that we should hold their refugees to the same standard.   Let's implement reciprocity of cultures. I do feel badly for people who live in pathetic countries, and there are provisions in our LEGAL IMMIGRATION system to allow case by case evaluation of immigration.     But what we have here is this pathetic bleeding heart feeling that everyone has a right to live here - but - some have to follow rules and some don't.   And when those that don't have to follow rules are of a certain ethnicity, we need to treat them special.    And if they've stolen their life here for a decade, well then, those people have shown us they are really good people - and - gasp - some even pay taxes!     So let's issue them a penalty and then give them a pathway to citizenship - they'll have to go to the back of the line but can still live here paying taxes and stealing a life here illegally, while others who actually follow the rules have to wait to get here.    Well, that is what John McCain and his apologetic ilk want us to believe.