English mother, Hannah Skidmarks, has no problem spending the equivalent of $1,300 per month on the beauty treatment that makes her and her three daughters feel "fabulous".

Two snaps in a fish formation, er, school.

Hannah is mother of Tia, 17, Brooke, who is 9 and is already practicing for her first porn shoot, and Valentina who is barely 1 and who has already digested two tubes of lipstick and dragged her diaperless ass across their white carpet and created the outline for a pageant runway as a result.

While regular mothers bathe their children, Hannah takes her brood to the spa where she says this is wonderful "mother-daughter-bonding time".    For $1,290 less, she could buy Gorilla glue to make the bonds more permanent.

Hannah claims that she is "teaching my daughters to look after themselves" and professes that "inner beauty doesn't get you laid like a great set of toned boobs".   Hannah continued that "these spa sessions allow us to giggle and to gossip about how big the girls' school mate boys might be and using a bit of skin to get the boys to show enough to eliminate them from consideration later."

It should be noted that while Valentina is only a year old, she gets a discount on her extreme makeover and will be free until she turns five.   

"Valentina will be a runway beauty once she gets past the free salon and spa sessions and will earn her keep by tricking boys into buying her lunch.    That girl already has talents that will make her one pretty gold digger once she's old enough to date British Royalty," said Hannah, otherwise known as Mommie the Most Dearest of them All.

And while you might think this story is make believe, Hannah also notes that the girls each get facials but is instructed not to swallow for fear they might get big bellies.   Even Valentina gets into the action as she sits in Hannah's lap while Hannah gets all her nails done and sometimes even Valentina gets hers done if their is enough paint left over from Mom's job.

As Hannah was gulping down some Champipple (made famous by Steptoe and Son), she noted that her daughters are being trained to place beauty ahead of all things and notes that she doesn't expect them to help keep the home clean nor should the girls think that the kitchen is something other than a dirty word.

"I make one of my boyfriends take care of the cleaning and they'll bring their sons over so the girls can guess their size and that makes such wonderful teaching.    By the time my girls are of legal age to marry and to divorce, they'll be set for life with alimony to cover their girls and their beauty treatments.    I'm also not bashful in teaching my girls about the facts of life and that they are never to just give away their pristine feminine condition.   Demand a wallet check and then to interview each prospect (after being size qualified) and to get their future plans down to the month.   I don't want my girls having to date someone whose ambition is to just go to college and to play with balls.   I want my girls to be beautiful and set up for their lives so they can come back and gossip with me while I'm 65 and beautiful."

Story was originally posted here and is far less illustrative than what I've reported.

Let's face it.

Women are irrational creatures who should be the furthest removed point from making decisions that affect thinking creatures.

Give woman an ant farm and they'd be hard pressed to contain the ants from fleeing.

It thus follows that women are a walking case of pre-existing conditions.   Why they whine for being equal, they do everything to give themselves an out to avoid equality - and every such flaunting of inequal treatment comes from using their biology.

Women are excused from killing their children because of something that is post partem.   The excuses for allowing a woman to act even more irrational than usual after they've given birth are numerous and manifold - and sickening.    Apparently there is no limit than can be imposed upon a woman's use of their biology for violence since the children can be five or more years of age removed from exiting the nasty snatch.

Abortion is another excuse for a woman's inability to grasp reality.    Women's vaginas are placed between two legs that are under the control of the woman.   The bitch can close her legs so that nothing passes (invokes Gandalf and his staff), yet when she consents to spreading them to expose that nasty snatch, a woman is afforded yet another opportunity to prevent pregancy.

"NO!"

So when she consents to open her legs and then fails to utter the word "NO", we are supposed to give her another chance to kill after the fact by having "remorseful feelings" after allowing a peen to enter and to squirt inside her nasty cavity.

So how many times do we give women to avoid being silly, irrational fools with regard to having control over their body?    Obviously women are weak in crossing their legs.   They are weak when having the ability to utter "NO" and to mean it.    And then they are absolutely a joke when it comes to ensuring no raw and exposed peen enters her nasty area.   Women are pre-existing conditions of silliness and unethical conduct.   They truly are the weaker sex.

And then we have the universally exalted "right" to having your pre-existing coverage paid for by others - a laughable excuse.

Insurance by definition is about covering UNFORESEEN situations.    If you've already been diagnosed with something, then insurance is not being used - welfare paid for by others is being invoked.   Those who have a condition should ALWAYS BE REQUIRED to should the burden and the entire cost of their health care.    I have yet to figure out how your assets are free for you to use for everything in life but using them to pay for your own healthcare is a tragedy!    You should be required to burn through every asset (including your house) to pay for YOUR OWN CARE.   It is not your responsibility to pay for my upkeep and I damned well resent having to cover your costs in my taxes and in my healthcare premium.    (your costs are exactly why I cannot afford healthcare insurance because I have to cover female problems and pre-existing conditions of someone else).

I can be convinced that there should be universal and national catastrophic care insurance that covers everyone - but once you croak, your entire assets are sold off to try to make the taxpayer's whole.    At no time should any person other than the pre-existing timebomb be required to pay for that person's care.   It is time to get a hold of the real purpose of insurance and to start making the sick bear the entire cost of their care or to use their assets to do the same.

And no one other than the sick should have to pay for costs of any disease that comes from a lifestyle - smoking, eating like a pig, humping and being promiscuous should not give you any protection and low fees.   If you do the deed, that is your problem - not mine.   Contract a disease or condition from a lifetime of being an idiot, then you should be zonked with the entire cost of your stupidity.

The war on men needs to stop.

Let's start holding women accountable to being equal to men.

We must immediately enforce these standards:

• No more attacking men in commercials where you mock them, hit them in the nuts, or to demean men.   If you do that in any production, you must then do the same to women - call it gender equal time.
• End biological excuse defenses - if you are a mother and you kill or hurt your child, you cannot use your biology as a justification why you acted - you should be charged for the full penalty of the law just like a man would.
• End biological different standards for women - hold women to the same standards that are imposed on men.
• End  all laws that require equal sports programs in colleges just so women will have a place to crow and to play - if a sport cannot sustain itself, that should be the standard - not just to have 10 programs for women if there are the same number for men.   This is not equality in today's world - this is forcing men's programs out of existence under elevating women to places they cannot sustain in the real life.
• End any reporting that this is the first woman to do this and that.   Since women are equal to men, it is therefore sexist to reveal when a woman gets a position it has never had before.
• End the use of sexist phrases like "man-splaing" and "man-spreading"; if this is to be used then you must report women as bitches, nags, and emotional vampires in the same production.   Women are just as abusive as men and it is time to stop bashing men because women can't handle men.
• End all use of "women" in any office title.   You are a Congressman if you are a man or woman.  Deal with it.
• End any family leave - if a woman gets knocked up, she made that decision and should be forced to deal with the consequences of that action.    And men should not be able to use this excuse to stay at home once the woman goes back to work.   You make your reproductive decisions and the business should not have to pay for your poor  choices
• End all birth control and maternity care in health insurance.   Insurance is for "unseen" events and pregnancy is not an unforeseen event - if you let an unprotected dick in your fucking, stank vagina, you know what will happen.   Ban allow use of insurance for any pregnancy care and force women to buy rider coverages to cover the costs of pregnancy.   
• End any requirement that men in health insurance have to pay for female biological care.   
• Force insurance companies to force women to pay the same insurance rates men pay for driving.   Or reduce men's rates to the level of females.
• Force women to the same standards in military boot camps and to do exactly the same thing men have to do.
• Force women to use gang showers and to be subjected to the same standards of nudity requirements as men.   Allow no woman to experience modesty - they should be subjected to the same embarrassment in high school as boys.
• Issue the death penalty to any woman who severes a man's genitalia.
• Allow no "women's" marches since that is special treatment.
• Ban all gender organizations like the National Organization of Nags (NOW).
• Hold women accountable for violating a man's rights to his bodies - women cannot approve a young male circumcision.
• End any discussion that a woman is being exploited because she is female - she is being exploited because she is stupid and lazy or is trying to use her biology to get something she can't get any way else. 
• End the use of "objectification of women" since nature has intended humans to be attracted to each other and to find them sexually arousing.   If women are so frigid that they find nothing sexually attractive, then perhaps they should be culled from the heard.

As a gay man, I generally have no use for women for anything.

I have two exceptions for the uselessness of females for my life:

• My mother and I escaped her womb;
• My sister who is dear to me as a friend;

After that, women serve no use in life that cannot be replicated by drag queens.

And no, we aren't going into the gender speculators who claim to be women when born with a penis and make our lives miserable in their misery.   These people don't count until after they fuck up what God fucked up on their DNA assembly line.

Women have now become nothing more than smelly, nasty, bitchy, whining, emotional vampires who seek to have equality while using their biology to have exceptions to every rule they proport to want to be included under.

In Washington on Saturday, January 21, we had an invasion of nearly a million nasty snatches that must have caused Washington to smell like the tuna ships had come into port while sounding like a shrill collection of banshees that are emotional wrecks just wanting to have a conversation about their feelings.

Women claim they aren't equal and deserve a special kind of equal that worships their womanity while wanting to reap rewards from substandard output and ability that men can't ever claim.

These women are hellbent to protect their fabricated and fake right to harvest millions of innocent fetal humans because women should control the process of reproduction.

Well, duh.

Women have an oven, a baby oven, that is no more different from a pizza oven.   Until you put something into the oven, it is empty (although the female version is a bloody and smelly mess in its off time).

Since women cannot yet fiat the creation of babies without men, women are the ultimate gatekeepers to all things in the baby making process.   Without allowing a peen into their pizza oven, women have the absolute right to deny entry and to curtail any baby making.

God has given women the ability to say "no" to a prospective peen entry to their pizza oven.    And while women aren't often prepared to exercise personal responsibility and often fall for the lure of a peen (and I can empathy for them when gazing upon a rigid male pole leaking precum and looking like a cockcicle), women nonetheless do have the right to deny entry to their pizza oven and are equipped with fat thighs and chunky legs that form a perfect obstacle from a prying and inquisitive peen.

When coupled together the word "no" and robust thighs and legs impeding peen entry are the ultimate female way to control the reproductive process.    I believe God gave women two separate abilities to impeded peen entry because he knew women would be irrational and would fall victim to their natural propensity for hysterical actions.

At no time has any conservative or Republican demanded that women's mouths be taped shut or that their legs be amputated, so women are perfectly in control of the reproductive process just by virtue of their natural equipment.

God has also created forms of sex that don't require a peen to even enter a nasty, smelly snatch.

God created the mouth which is a wonderful receptacle for peen and semen and also cures the major problem of women - their voice and their irrational conversation requirements.    When a woman is slurping down the glans and taking as much shaft as she can muster, a woman is silenced in a gift that can only be traced to intelligent design.    Women can't ask about your feelings or if you will cuddle with them after you fill their mouths with baby batter.    This silence is a great incentive to never even enter a smelly snatch (and those nasty screeches she makes when you slam her puss without a sock being placed in her mouth).

God also gave women a back door just like she gave men.    If a woman is truly worried about getting knocked up by a load of robust baby batter, then women should be compelled to have a peen jammed up their rear ends just to remind them that taking it up the butt doesn't require contraceptives either.    There is no recorded case of a butt baby ever being born even though Moochelle Obama seems like she could have been one.

And so we have here actions in which Donald Trump and Republicans would not want to deny a woman - and Republicans seem to like going down payments just as well as Bill Clinton; and most God fearing Christian Republicans seem to like butt humping for themselves even if they claim that when "dem faggots" do it, its immoral.  

Oh, well.

Now what women want is special rights - they want to have an escape clause from their personal responsibility.   You see, when they see that nice, juicy, thick peen pointing all majestic into the air, they want that peen inside of them and claim to have spells cast upon them which weakens their "no" reflex and causes their legs to open like a draw bridge without any control by their rationale woman parts of the brain (do those exist?"

So women want to be excused from their natural peen entry prevention skills and when that peen squirts highly robust and fertile baby batter into their nasty snatch, women want to roll back their responsibility and to excuse them from being dumb ass cunts who were put under the spell of a delicious peen!

Now, women want to handle their ex post facto twinge of personal responsibility by demanding we give them free condoms and free birth control pills and other free contraceptives (as if the quality of men that they date would suggest that if the man doesn't come with his own magnum rubbers would be indicative of the stupidity of the women to allow them to enter unwrapped).    You can look through all of human history and all the documents from the Magna Carta to the Rights of Man to our Declaration of Independence, our Articles of Confederation, our Constitution, and our individual bucket lists, and never find one reference to the right to having your contraceptives paid for by someone else and given to stupid women!

Of course, when women are confronted with the flaws of free contraceptives, they then fall back to the leftist swine butchery of abortion which women assert is their right because only they should control their own bodies.

Queerly, women seem to never extent the right to a person's control over their own bodies to male children as women consent to have their son's peens butchered and to have their foreskins sliced and diced off their little weiners.   

Apparently in real application, women control everyone's body and men control whatever women decide to give them like three feet of closet space.

There is a problem with abortion and it flies in the face of the women's insistence that abortion should be their decision and no one else's.

The Constitution does limit individual rights and liberties in that exercising rights stops when that exercise denies another citizen of free exercise of a right.

Now since we know that a fetus is protected under laws like killing a woman loaded with a fetus that can be considered two deaths instead of one selfish vessel and a blob of tissue.   So there are times when a fetus is more than a blob of tissue that militant abortion rights advocates claim.   It is thus that we must also extend that a fetus inside is never a cucumber, a cute Koala bear, or even a stapler.    So we can't just dismiss a fetus in its early development as something other than human - after all, even a heart is a part of a human and is human tissue; but a fetus is never considered to be a permanent "resident" of a woman and thus is a separate entity - and but for the fact that it is contained in the woman, it would be a citizen if dropped from the womb like a Mexican invader in Arizona dropping an anchor baby.

And since we have now documented that a fetus is (1) human and (2) a separate entity, and (3) would be a citizen at a moment's notice, the fetus is all those things and must be given the equal protection of the Constitution and afforded the very same rights a woman claims.

It is therefore impossible for abortion to be considered a right since abortion is always fatal to the fetus which denies the fetus the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness that is a basic human right.  And since the woman is exercising the fabricated right of being the judge, jury, and executioner, her actions of abortion is violative of due process rights of the fetus.    We afford serial killers the most basic of due process protections yet we don't give the most innocent of lives, the fetus, and due process rights to hear their case and to weight the actions of the woman against fetal
Constitutional rights.

Women will then try to make all cases of abortion into questions of rape and incest, but that begs the question, "how is the method of conception the ultimate right to deny the fetus all due process rights?"    The fetus did not pick its semen donor and just because life was created from a disgusting action, why should we be killing the fetus instead of amputating some bad cock?

And so we have the ultimate case that refutes and destroys women's claims about extending abortion as a legal birth control method after the fact and after the woman has humper's remorse!

Because women are women and have the biology that necessarily creates life from a peen, a virile seed, and an available pizza oven, they cannot demand protections just because they are women.    Now if a deposit of seed gives them venereal diseases, they can sue a man.    But the natural action of life cannot simply be dismissed just to make a woman feel better about selecting a bad man.    And since sex is always optional and controllable, women should not be allowed an extra chance to say, "fuck it, I don't want the baby" after she's spread her legs and done everything to enjoy the process.   And with rape and incest being actions that can happen to a man and that the life created from such actions is no less precious and Constitutionally protected with due process rights, women should be bound to their unfortunate situation.   A man can be raped and can get AIDS and that is a life changing unfortunate result.   Pregnancy is a temporary issue.

And then we come to life of the woman.    Oddly, this is the one area where there is at least some due process actions, even if by accident.   The fetus is not instantly executed on a whim.  Doctor's try everything to save the sinking ship and as a last resort start throwing things over board to save the ship.    And this is where abortion should only be allowed - in cases of the women's life.  

Other than that, abortion should be considered murder and the woman should be compelled to carry the life because that life had nothing to do with the process or decision and is thus considered the most innocent party in the whole affair!

Democrats are all abuzz that they finally have the killer story to put Donald J. Trump into the record book of pencil holders John McCain, Bob Dole, and the Binder Filled With Women Metrosexual, Mittens Romney.

It is now certain that Donald J. Trump loves pussy.

He wants to hold it.

He wants to fuck it.

He wants to grope it.

He admits that he is a heterosexual male when doing so is tantamount to beating a women; for to the left, loving and wanting to sniff and to fuck cunt is equal to rape.   Even thinking about using a woman for pleasure is equal to rape.

So the left is just beside themselves - Hillary is confused since she loves pussy too - but she has to have a public and private position for everything (from her latest hacked emails from her turd campaign manager Podesta).   Privately she's making Huma purr (and is celebrating 20 years of doing so).  Publicly she's having to remember the last time she fucked her rapist husband.

Now Donald Trump is caught being a real man and actually talking vulgar about pussy.   Can you imagine the hysteria that is going on it dyke bars where they have to admit they talk vulgar about miss piggy, fat, and stank pussy.    Trump is talking about wanting to do beautiful women!   Good lawd!  (Clutching my pearl necklace with so much energy that I think I broke a nail).

Our investigators with Bubba News Network (BNN) went to bars across the nation and interviewed men to see if they were outraged that Donald wants to grope boobs and hold onto pussy.    We were shocked to find that there were no men that found the way he said this to be offensive.

"Focking A, man!" said Jethro Rammingston.   "I loves me some cunt too.  I love burying my face into those cunt lips and licking it until she gushes."

"I love boobs.  Donald loves boobs.   I will vote for him," said Stroking Joe, the bartender at Tits and Twats, a Nashville Bar and Pool Room.

When we went to metrosexual juice bars, there was universal outrage from male patrons who were sitting crosslegged and wearing sandals.

"That's just gross.   My girlfriend told me I should hate Trump and I'll do what she says," says Barry Farqua.

"My girlfriend tells me that I should never objectify her and that when we make love, she tells me what to do and then gives me permission to finish in a Kleenex."  remarked Brad Fadwell.

Across the nation women who want to be paid equal pay for taking years off because they decided not to abort their one night stand byproduct were outraged.   Sadly we could not quote what the women said because the language was so nasty and toe curling that even I blushed.

Back in 2006, there was a charge against three Duke University LaCrosse players that they had raped a woman, and this case was working toward the court system - the case was filed by a rogue and dishonest prosecutor (the kind that the fools in Missouri wanted in the phat angel case) - and the charges were found to be all fabricated.     The word of a woman against men.  

Then we have the recent story of a woman named "Jackie" being part of a gang rape at the University of Virginia.    And as is almost always the case, the claim by a woman of being rape trumps actually investigating the charges BEFORE reporting the "crime".    The male perpetrators are never given any time to give their side of the story.     Well, now it is being discovered that the author of the "Rolling Stones" piece did not even bother to do anything more than to report the story of Jackie.   She did no background research and did not once contact the men.    The story is now unraveling and it may be totally bogus!

And like a cherry on top of a sundae, we have the entirely false account by Lena Dunham who claimed she had been raped by a college republican with a big mustache.    This story is unraveling so fast that Lena might be laughed out of society - but might just be dishonest enough to be the 2016 Democrat Presidential nominee (assuming she were old enough to run, but maybe she could write an executive order before she becomes President to make herself qualified to run).

Since women feel compelled to invent rape charges - we are seeing this happen with Bill Cosby - so many come out of the woodwork - are these real charges that would make Bill Cosby a serial rapist like we've never seen before or are these women trying to exploit a few real rape charges for their own profit?  Just remember that rape charges against men are not believed when the man is a Democrat like Bill Clinton - his accusers were demeaned by the very people who claim to be all for women's rights and are the same bitches that are hounding Bill Cosby!

I offer the following remedies to men against women who ACCUSE them of rape without proof....

(1) Women must put up $100 million to pay for men's legal fees since the man can't prove he did not rape a woman - this would be like a bond.   If the rape charges are valid, the women get their money back; if not, they lose all of the money.
(2) Start imprisoning women who make up rape charges - a couple years will cure dishonesty.
(3) Publicly shame all women who falsely claim rape - have a registry of false rape accusers and require employers to search this registry before hiring women - this way the very same damage the women cause on men is now turned toward the accusers so their dishonesty is exposed in perpetuity. 

Independent-UK -  A pioneering study has shown for the first time that the brains of men and women are wired up differently which could explain some of the stereotypical differences in male and female behaviour, scientists have said. Researchers found that many of the connections in a typical male brain run between the front and the back of the same side of the brain, whereas in women the connections are more likely to run from side to side between the left and right hemispheres of the brain. This difference in the way the nerve connections in the brain are “hardwired” occurs during adolescence when many of the secondary sexual characteristics such as facial hair in men and breasts in women develop under the influence of sex hormones, the study found. The researchers believe the physical differences between the two sexes in the way the brain is hardwired could play an important role in understanding why men are in general better at spatial tasks involving muscle control while women are better at verbal tasks involving memory and intuition. Psychological testing has consistently indicated a significant difference between the sexes in the ability to perform various mental tasks, with men outperforming women in some tests and women outperforming men in others. Now there seems to be a physical explanation, scientists said. “These maps show us a stark difference - and complementarity - in the architecture of the human brain that helps to provide a potential neural basis as to why men excel at certain tasks, and women at others,” said Ragini Verma, professor of psychology at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. “What we've identified is that, when looked at in groups, there are connections in the brain that are hardwired differently in men and women. Functional tests have already shown than when they carry out certain tasks, men and women engage different parts of the brain,” Professor Verma said. The research was carried out on 949 individuals - 521 females and 428 males - aged between 8 and 22. The brain differences between the sexes only became apparent after adolescence, the study found. A special brain-scanning technique called diffusion tensor imaging, which can measure the flow of water along a nerve pathway, established the level of connectivity between nearly 100 regions of the brain, creating a neural map of the brain called the “connectome”, Professor Verma said. “It tells you whether one region of the brain is physically connected to another part of the brain and you can get significant differences between two populations,” Professor Verma said. “In women most of the connections go between left and right across the two hemispheres while in men most of the connections go between the front and the back of the brain,” she said. Because the female connections link the left hemisphere, which is associated with logical thinking, with the right, which is linked with intuition, this could help to explain why women tend to do better than men at intuitive tasks, she added. “Intuition is thinking without thinking. It's what people call gut feelings. Women tend to be better than men at these kinds of skill which are linked with being good mothers,” Professor Verma said. Many previous psychological studies have revealed significant differences between the sexes in the ability to perform various cognitive tests. Men tend to outperform women involving spatial tasks and motor skills - such as map reading - while women tend to better in memory tests, such as remembering words and faces, and social cognition tests, which try to measure empathy and “emotional intelligence”. A separate study published last month found that the genes expressed in the human brain did so differently in men and women. Post-mortem tests on the brain and spinal cord of 100 individuals showed significant genetic differences between the sexes, which could account for the observed gender differences in neurological disorders, such as autism, according to scientists from University College London. For instance, one theory of autism, which is affects about five times as many boys as girls, is that it is a manifestation of the “extreme male brain”, which is denoted by a failure to be able to show empathy towards others. The latest study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, showed that the differences in the male and female “connectomes” develop during at the same age of onset of the gender differences seen in psychological tests. The only part of the brain where right-left connectivity was greater in men than in women was in the cerebellum, an evolutionary ancient part of the brain that is linked with motor control. “It's quite striking how complementary the brains of women and men really are,” said Rubin Gur of Pennsylvania University, a co-author of the study. “Detailed connectome maps of the brain will not only help us better understand the differences between how men and women think, but it will also give us more insight into the roots of neurological disorders, which are often sex related,” Dr Gur said.